W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Re-definition of Linked Data

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:51:03 -0400
Message-ID: <51BF5A97.5010401@dbooth.org>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 06/17/2013 01:43 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> If the W3C's RDF group is to endorseJSON-LD as a recommended concrete
> syntax for RDF, then it is natural (and basic common sense) for said
> workgroup to define Linked Data using the bullet points outlined in
> TimBL's revised meme.

Okay, but I am confused about the details of what you are suggesting. 
Are you suggesting that the JSON-LD intro use the following list where 
it describes Linked Data?

   1. Use URIs as names for things

   2. Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names.

   3. When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the 
standards (RDF*, SPARQL)

   4. Include links to other URIs. so that they can discover more things.

Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 18:51:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC