Re: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data) from David Booth on 2013-06-12 (public-rdf-comments@w3.org from June 2013)

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:13:11 -0400
To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <51B8AC27.3040509@dbooth.org>

On 06/12/2013 10:50 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2013, at 3:12 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

>> This is what we ended up ending to the spec:
>>
>>   JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON,
>>   with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, JSON-LD
>>   was also designed to be usable as RDF, so people intending to use
>>   JSON-LD with RDF tools will find it can be used like any other
>>   RDF syntax. Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in
>>   C. Relationship to RDF.

+1

Nicely phrased!

David

Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 17:13:37 UTC