- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:35:03 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 06/12/2013 04:54 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: [ . . . ] > Since people are citing http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData and > talking about its earlier draft that didn't say (RDF, SPARQL,...) One small factual clarification: Even the earliest public draft of that document explicitly mentions RDF and is clear that RDF is intended: http://web.archive.org/web/20061115043657/http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html The current version adds another mention of RDF directly to the list of four expectations, so it cannot be missed even on the most cursory reading. David
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 13:35:35 UTC