Re: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data)

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>  On 06/10/2013 10:29 PM, Manu Sporny wrote:
>
> JSON-LD was designed to be compatible with Semantic Web technologies like
> RDF and SPARQL.
>
> +1

> People intending to use JSON-LD with RDF tools
>
> Not sure how that would work.  Suggestion:  people intending to use
JSON-LD to express RDF data...
 (or "rdf graphs" or whatever).  My project currently uses an XML -> turtle
pipeline, where the XML is effectively used to express (represent, if you
like) "rdf data", just because it's easier to inspect and edit.  I look
forward to using JSON-LD to express the same thing in a directly
RDF-compatible language (or "RDF dialect"? "member of the RDF syntax
family"?).

-Gregg Reynolds

Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 16:47:23 UTC