W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data)

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:00:18 -0400
Message-ID: <51B72D72.9060405@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'public-rdf-comments' <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 06/10/2013 11:49 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> I think there may be other positive outcomes.    Without getting into
> them, I think there might be a compromise in mentioning RDF toward the
> beginning in a very careful way that preserves some distance and does
> not make people feel they should go off and read about RDF.  Something
> like this in the Introduction:
>     JSON-LD was designed to be compatible with Semantic Web technologies
>     like RDF and SPARQL.  People intending to use JSON-LD with RDF tools
>     will find it can be used as another RDF syntax, like Turtle. 
>     Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in Appendix C.

+0.5, I could live with something like this.

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 14:00:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC