On Monday, June 10, 2013 2:15 AM, David Booth wrote: > On 06/09/2013 07:16 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > > I think adding a reference as > > you suggest is very reasonable and makes it clear that we are just > > quickly describing the concept here. > > > > So, would you be satisfied if we would add the reference but not > > remove the description? > > Not unless RDF is added to the description. The problem is that it > reads as a definition. This is specifically why I proposed deleting > the > portions of the description that say *how* Linked Data works, leaving > only the portions that describe its purpose and effect: to ensure that > it does not sound like a definition. "Linked Data [LINKED-DATA] is a technique for creating a network of inter-connected data across different documents and Web sites. In general, Linked Data has four properties: ..." I can't see how a reader could be confused by this. But anyway. Unfortunately it looks like we can't agree on a compromise. I think I made my arguments clear and don't have more to say at this point. I'll let others weigh in on this discussion. Thanks, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthalerReceived on Monday, 10 June 2013 09:44:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC