- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:27:29 -0400
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 20:27:53 UTC
On 6/8/13 2:27 PM, David Booth wrote: > Yes. We are arguing about the attempt to re-defined the notion of > Linked Data to not be based on RDF. You can seriously make that inaccurate claim after reading the original meme <http://web.archive.org/web/20061201121454/http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html> ? Linked Data took off without an RDF specificity. Linked Data is something you can produce, in highly useful form, via RDF. That doesn't make it a subset of RDF. Sorry, but that's utter nonsense! -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 20:27:53 UTC