W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: Official response to RDF-ISSUE-132: JSON-LD/RDF Alignment

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:27:29 -0400
Message-ID: <51B393B1.5050704@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 6/8/13 2:27 PM, David Booth wrote:
> Yes. We are arguing about the attempt to re-defined the notion of 
> Linked Data to not be based on RDF. 
You can seriously make that inaccurate claim after reading the original 

Linked Data took off without an RDF specificity.

Linked Data is something you can produce, in highly useful form, via 
RDF. That doesn't make it a subset of RDF. Sorry, but that's utter nonsense!



Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen

Received on Saturday, 8 June 2013 20:27:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC