- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:28:09 -0400
- To: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- CC: "Carroll, Jeremy" <jjc@syapse.com>
Also, the current grammar does not allow comments, though it should, because as Jeremy Carroll pointed out, the original n-triples format allowed comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2013Jul/0109.html Here is the original n-triples grammar: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#comment So these omissions seem to be bugs in the grammar, rather than being intentional. BTW, the correction I suggested below is also wrong, as it would not allow blank lines that contain whitespace (nor does it allow comments). Thanks, David On 07/17/2013 12:42 PM, David Booth wrote: > Blank lines are currently prohibited by the n-triples grammar: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/n-triples.html#n-triples-grammar > > > That seems overly strict. I suggest changing the ntriplesDoc production > to: > > [1] ntriplesDoc ::= EOL* (triple EOL+)* triple? > > David > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2013 18:28:37 UTC