Re: Serd Turtle implementation report

I think UNTESTED is just fine; it's not necessary to show interoperability, as that has already been done.

Perhaps EARL should have a category for "willfully skipped this test in protest" :)

Gregg Kellogg
Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 26, 2013, at 6:09 PM, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:44 -0800, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>>> On Dec 24, 2013, at 3:10 PM, David Robillard <d@drobilla.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Attached is an updated report for Serd on the latest Turtle test suite.
>> 
>> Thanks, I've added your results to <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/reports/index.html>.
> 
> Great, thanks.  Would you like me to run one with the protested SPARQL
> pReFiX/BaSe tests included, or is "UNTESTED" okay?
> 
> (I personally prefer "UNTESTED" since the omission is deliberate)
> 
> -- 
> dr
>