[RESOLVED] Re: N-Triples - Editorial issues

On 12/05/2013 01:42 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 03/12/13 22:52, David Booth wrote:
>> 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#dfn-canonical-n-triple-document
>> says: "Characters MUST be represented directly and not by UCHAR."
>> Shouldn't that be something like: "Characters allowed directly in
>> STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE MUST be represented directly and not by UCHAR." ?
> Peter Ansell has a related and overlapping comment [*] - if I may, I'll
> combine the comments and respond once there.
> [*]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Nov/0087.html
>> 2. Throughout the document, the name of the language is inconsistently
>> spelled, sometimes as "N-Triples" and sometimes as "N-Triple"
>> (singular).  PLEASE make the spelling consistent as "N-Triples"
>> throughout.  This is more important than you may think, because
>> inconsistency in the spec encourages inconsistent spellings in the wild
>> among tools, which just causes unnecessary headache and wasted time for
>> users.
> Done in the editors working draft.  I also applied the same rules to the
> N-Quads document.
> Please reply with "[RESOLVED]" in the subject line to acknowledge
> handling of this part of your comment.

This part of my comment has been resolved to my satisfaction.


Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 19:18:13 UTC