public-rdf-comments@w3.org from December 2013 by date

Monday, 30 December 2013

• comments on 17 December 2013 WD of RDF 1.1 Primer Bob DuCharme
• Re: rdflib test reports Gregg Kellogg
• rdflib test reports Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes

Friday, 27 December 2013

• Re: Serd Turtle implementation report David Robillard
• Re: Serd Turtle implementation report Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Serd Turtle implementation report David Robillard
• Re: Serd Turtle implementation report David Robillard

Thursday, 26 December 2013

• Re: Serd Turtle implementation report Gregg Kellogg

Tuesday, 24 December 2013

• Serd Turtle implementation report David Robillard
• TurtleTests/localName_with_non_leading_extras URI escape David Robillard

Monday, 23 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth

Sunday, 22 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Guus Schreiber

Thursday, 19 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Guus Schreiber
• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• What's New in RDF 1.1 Erich Bremer
• Re: ISSUE-165: datatype map Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth

Wednesday, 18 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-165: datatype map Guus Schreiber
• Re: ISSUE-148: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

• Re: Resolution needed: ISSUE-165: datatype map Michael Schneider
• Re: Implementation report RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Implementation report RDF Semantics Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Implementation report RDF Semantics Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Implementation report RDF Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Implementation report RDF Semantics Gregg Kellogg
• Implementation report RDF Semantics Jan Wielemaker
• Re: Resolution needed: ISSUE-165: datatype map Guus Schreiber

Monday, 16 December 2013

• Fwd: Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• RE: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Wood
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Peter Ansell
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth

Sunday, 15 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Pat Hayes
• RE: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth

Saturday, 14 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Pat Hayes
• RE: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Dan Brickley
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• RE: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 13 December 2013

• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource David Booth
• Re: A comment on issue-148 David Booth
• Re: Raptor 2.0.12 implementation reports - N-Triples, Trig, Turtle Gregg Kellogg
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Richard Light
• RE: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Markus Lanthaler
• Raptor 2.0.12 implementation reports - N-Triples, Trig, Turtle Dave Beckett

Thursday, 12 December 2013

• Re: XMLLiteral and HTML Richard Light

Wednesday, 11 December 2013

• Re: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' Annette Greiner
• RE: [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' Markus Lanthaler
• [RESOLVED] Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents David Booth
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents David Booth
• [RESOLVED] Re: N-Triples - Please encourage ntriples tools to emit *canonical* N-Triples David Booth
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-Triples - Please encourage ntriples tools to emit *canonical* N-Triples Andy Seaborne
• Re: revised EARL report on RDF Semantics for Corese Gregg Kellogg
• revised EARL report on RDF Semantics for Corese Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann

Tuesday, 10 December 2013

• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents David Booth
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: XMLLiteral and HTML Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes

Monday, 9 December 2013

• [RESOLVED] Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Peter Ansell
• [RESOLVED] Re: N-Quads and N-Triples Candidate Recommendations and Normative links to RDF-1.1 Concepts Peter Ansell
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• [RESOLVED] Re: N-Quads backwards compatibility with respect to UTF-8/US-ASCII Peter Ansell
• Re: RDF 1.1 Semantics Implementation Report on the Swertia RDF-Based Reasoner Michael Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF 1.1 Semantics Implementation Report on the Swertia RDF-Based Reasoner Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 8 December 2013

• Re: RDF 1.1 Semantics Implementation Report on the Swertia RDF-Based Reasoner Michael Schneider
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• Re: N-Quads backwards compatibility with respect to UTF-8/US-ASCII Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-Quads and N-Triples Candidate Recommendations and Normative links to RDF-1.1 Concepts Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 7 December 2013

• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Pat Hayes
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider

Friday, 6 December 2013

• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: N-Triples - Please encourage ntriples tools to emit *canonical* N-Triples David Booth
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents David Booth
• Re: Escaped characters in RDF-1.1 N-Triples literals for Canonical documents Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-Triples - Please encourage ntriples tools to emit *canonical* N-Triples Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 5 December 2013

• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Michael Schneider
• [RESOLVED] Re: N-Triples - Editorial issues David Booth
• Re: N-Triples - Editorial issues Andy Seaborne
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of madi.solomon@pearson.com
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Dan Brickley
• RE: BNF expression of RDF Concepts (ISSUE-176) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics Guus Schreiber
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts Richard Light
• Re: ISSUE-148: RDF Concepts - IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource Guus Schreiber
• Re: BNF expression of RDF Concepts Eric Prud'hommeaux
• BNF expression of RDF Concepts Richard Light
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk

Wednesday, 4 December 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of dbaron@dbaron.org
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of amgreiner@lbl.gov
• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of laurent.flory@universite-lyon.fr
• XMLLiteral and HTML Richard Light
• Re: N-Triples - Editorial issues Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 3 December 2013

• N-Triples - Editorial issues David Booth
• N-Triples - Please encourage ntriples tools to emit *canonical* N-Triples David Booth

Monday, 2 December 2013

• RDF 1.1 Semantics Implementation Report on the Swertia RDF-Based Reasoner Michael Schneider

Sunday, 1 December 2013

• [wbs] response to 'Call for Review: JSON-LD 1.0, JSON-LD 1.0 Processing Algorithms and API are W3C Proposed Recommendations' WBS Mailer on behalf of erich.bremer@stonybrook.edu

Last message date: Monday, 30 December 2013 23:25:40 UTC