Re: Turtle test suite *more* finalized

* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-08-12 07:57-0700]
> On 8/12/13 12:23 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > This message addresses two comments to correct the test suite and
> > corrects the example EARL in the previous message.
> > 
> > Changes:
> > 
> > 1 Changed last ntriples file localName_with_non_leading_extras.nt to use
> >   2004 NTriples (had used high unicode characters) per Dave Beckett's
> >   message <http://www.w3.org/mid/520804C3.3060404@dajobe.org>.
> >   
> > 2 Added text to the README about a 4th type of test:
> >   [[
> >     4 Negative Evaluation (rdft:TestTurtleNegativeEval) - a pair of an
> >     input turtle file and reference ntriples file. These tests have the
> >     same properties as rdft:TestTurtleEval.
> >   ]]
> >   per Dave Beckett's message <http://www.w3.org/mid/520869B9.3010208@dajobe.org>.
> 
> Thanks but a negative eval test seems to just have a turtle file; no
> reference ntriples file.  I'm still not clear what it means to 'pass' this
> test and how it differs from a negative syntax test.  If parsing fails, it's
> a pass?  Could you clarify for me?

You're right. I meant to write that it was effectively the same as a
rdft:TestTurtleNegativeSyntax (updated in R1.5). I invoke it the same
way apart from the fact that I add a "--validation iricharacters"
arguments to make SWObjects peek into the IRI string.


> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 

-- 
-ericP

Received on Monday, 12 August 2013 18:04:17 UTC