- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:29:53 -0400
- To: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
Hi all, Please note that James posted this at my request and, as such, does not require a formal response from the WG. However, I do hope that it informs our discussions by providing another current implementation design decision and justification. Regards, Dave On Oct 4, 2012, at 11:18, James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I was watching the thread on on Dataset Syntax[1] and wanted to share > how we store metadata in Callimachus. When a graph is imported into > Callimachus it is given a "local" URI, a URI that resolves to the > Callimachus server. The metadata about who uploaded and when it was > uploaded is stored in another metadata graph (we call it an activity > graph now). I wrote up some examples of these graphs in a blog post > titled Provenance and Traceability in RDF with Callimachus[2]. Check out > the last example for a metadata graph that describes importing another > graph. > > Hope this helps, > James > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0249.html > [2] http://jamesrdf.blogspot.ca/2012/10/provenance-and-traceability-in.html > >
Received on Thursday, 4 October 2012 15:30:21 UTC