- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 10:40:27 +0100
- To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Cc: RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 2012-08-17, at 20:03, Gavin Carothers wrote: >> 4. Do nothing. > > +1 > > In Turtle there is a very important section 5 Conformance Note: > > "This specification does not define how Turtle parsers handle > non-conforming input documents." > > If this feature has wide spread need I fully expect some > implementations to implement it, the Turtle parser will still very > much be conforming. Exactly what media type or how that not exactly > Turtle document might be provided is unclear but that hasn't ever > stopped anyone ;) Yes, agreed. The fact that only Virtuoso supported the is … of syntax in Turtle (due to legacy from a N3 parser), and nobody supports ^ suggests to me that it's not ripe for standardisation this time round. If it's really that useful (I can imagine it is, but I don't write Turtle by hand very often) then people will implement it. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 20 August 2012 09:40:56 UTC