- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:47:33 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 29 Aug 2011, at 22:12, Gregg Kellogg wrote: >> While [#0000- ] is valid EBNF it's not exactly readable ;) > > Well, given the rather week spec for EBNF, it's hard to tell if it's valid. Perhaps you could expand on it's interpretation. [A-Z] is everything from “A” to “Z”. [ -Z] is everything from space to “Z”. [#0000- ] is everything from code point 0 to space (code point 32). (I guess.) > FWIW, I don't find ( ... ) very useful, but, e.g., '[ a <node> ] .' can be useful. I'd suggest adding a production to support it. +0.5. I've often been annoyed by having to use one syntax for “top-level” blank nodes and another for “nested” blank nodes. OTOH, Turtle should change as little as possible and align with SPARQL. Best, Richard
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 06:48:07 UTC