- From: David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:15:49 -0500
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 14:16:19 UTC
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > I wrote up the issue and use cases for R2RML's handling of non-unique > tables: > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Non-unique_Tables> > Eric - Thanks for writing this up. It is helpful. I have a question for clarification. As a matter of fact, this statement does not seem accurate to me: "This makes it impossible for one to generate an R2RML mapping to the DM of a table with potentially repeated rows." An R2RML feature not mentioned in the writeup is the ability to define a logical view in an R2RML mapping. Such a view can contain a SQL statement (and R2RML has been defined with the idea of using database specific SQL in such cases). I believe this capability means that we cannot say it is "impossible" for an R2RML mapping to capture the DM of a table with repeated rows. We can debate about whether it is practical to write or if the runtime costs are too high, etc. but I don't think we can say it is impossible. -David
Received on Sunday, 13 May 2012 14:16:19 UTC