Re: Proposal for “per-row blank node maps” in R2RML from ashok malhotra on 2012-05-08 (public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from May 2012)

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:02:40 -0700
To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <4FA99800.2060803@oracle.com>

On 5/8/2012 1:45 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> The proposal is to allow omitting the rr:column/rr:template/rr:constant if the term type is rr:BlankNode.
I don't like the absence of something to trigger behaviour.  A naive use may think that
the absence of rr:column/rr:template/rr:constant was a bug and may be surprised by getting
unique blanknode IDs.  How about a keyword such as rr:UNIQUE to indicate that unique
identifiers are desired.

Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 22:01:42 UTC