Re: Please review R2RML changes - diff available

On 2 May 2012, at 14:21, David McNeil wrote:
> I noticed a minor grammatical issue in the changes. In the first note in section 11, this text appears: "an R2RML processors". I think it needs to be tweaked to either "R2RML processors" or "an R2RML processor".

Thanks! Fixed.

Richard

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 14:48:06 UTC