- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:58:15 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
This sentence does not really work for me... [[[ If the Group gathers sufficient evidence of interoperable implementations, based on the results of the Candidate Recommendation phase but also reflecting this version's changes, the group may request to skip 2nd Candidate Recommendation drafts and have the next round of publications be Proposed Recommendations, but no earlier than XX Month 2012. ]]] Did you want to say "Comments on this working draft are due on or before XX Month 2012." at the end? On May 2, 2012, at 12:46 , Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Ivan, > > I've updated the SotD section in the ED accordingly. I've changed it a bit to keep some of the previous wording related to the implementation report in there. Let me know if anything still needs changing: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#status > > Best, > Richard > > > On 2 May 2012, at 11:19, Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> [[[ >>>> This document is a 2nd Last Call Working Draft of the "R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language". This version reflects changes made as a result of comments received during a Call for Implementations (Candidate Recommendation) period. The Working Group believes that all comments received have been addressed. >>>> >>>> The Working Group welcomes reports of implementations, sent to the comments address. If the Group gathers sufficient evidence of interoperable implementations, based on the results of the Candidate Recommendation phase but also reflecting the changes on the document as an answer to the comments, the group may request to skip 2nd Candidate Recommendation drafts and have the next round of publications be Proposed Recommendations. >>>> ]]] >>> >>> Assuming this is the way we go, this sounds good to me. >>> >>> Just to be sure: Formally, this document would be a Working Draft? >> >> Yes >> >>> >>> Should this contain a date somewhere, to indicate the end of the 2nd LC phase (with a placeholder date for now)? >> >> yes >> >> Ivan >> >>> >>> Best, >>> Richard >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 11:55:38 UTC