Re: Addressing the no-PK table issue (was: Re: Please review R2RML changes - diff available)

On May 2, 2012, at 12:04 , Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> Ivan,
> 

[skip]
> 
>>> Please send me a pointer to the appropriate SotD boilerplate whenever you're ready.
>> 
>> I guess you are talking about one subsection of http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/ only.
>> 
>> How does that sound? 
>> 
>> [[[
>> This document is a 2nd Last Call Working Draft of the "R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language". This version reflects changes made as a result of comments received during a Call for Implementations (Candidate Recommendation) period. The Working Group believes that all comments received have been addressed.
>> 
>> The Working Group welcomes reports of implementations, sent to the comments address. If the Group gathers sufficient evidence of interoperable implementations, based on the results of the Candidate Recommendation phase but also reflecting the changes on the document as an answer to the comments, the group may request to skip 2nd Candidate Recommendation drafts and have the next round of publications be Proposed Recommendations.
>> ]]]
> 
> Assuming this is the way we go, this sounds good to me.
> 
> Just to be sure: Formally, this document would be a Working Draft?

Yes

> 
> Should this contain a date somewhere, to indicate the end of the 2nd LC phase (with a placeholder date for now)?

yes

Ivan

> 
> Best,
> Richard


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 10:17:05 UTC