Re: More R2RML and Test Cases commentary from DanC

Thanks Richard, Ashok.

Yes, I agree we need more examples.
I'm going to update the tcs as soon as I find a time slot for that.
I think tcs are included in the next meeting agenda right?

Boris



On 23/09/2011 19:09, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 23 Sep 2011, at 16:52, ashok malhotra wrote:
>> Richard, is there a bottom line other than "we need more examples" (which I agree with)?
> Well, there's a couple of points in there that are worth pondering, but no clear bottom line.
>
>  From a process POV, this was just some IRC chatter, so it's not something we *have* to handle as a last call comment.
>
> I think it's up to the respective editors to see if they can take anything useful/actionable away from it.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
>> Ashok
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:	More R2RML and Test Cases commentary from DanC
>> Resent-Date:	Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:39:31 +0000
>> Resent-From:	public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
>> Date:	Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:39:01 +0100
>> From:	Richard Cyganiak<richard@cyganiak.de>
>> To:	public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
>>
>> This is relevant for the R2RML and Test Cases editors:
>>
>>
>> http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2011-09-22#T13-42-57
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Richard
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 24 September 2011 09:14:08 UTC