Re: LC publication

> forgot to include the # in #sec-depttable_mapping in the last email,
> here is the list again (with that correction)
>
> 	 four occurrences of #sec-tables needs to be replaced with  #ex_DEPT
> 	 one occurrence of #sec-depttable_mapping needs to be replaced  
> with #example-r2rml-view
> 	 two occurrences of #def-template-value needs to be replaced with  
> #dfn-template-value

This has been fix now in v.10 and also the ack section has been  
updated to address 'special thanks' ...

Cheers,
	Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 15 Sep 2011, at 16:58, Souripriya Das wrote:

> forgot to include the # in #sec-depttable_mapping in the last email,
> here is the list again (with that correction)
>
> 	 four occurrences of #sec-tables needs to be replaced with  #ex_DEPT
> 	 one occurrence of #sec-depttable_mapping needs to be replaced  
> with #example-r2rml-view
> 	 two occurrences of #def-template-value needs to be replaced with  
> #dfn-template-value
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
>
> Souripriya Das wrote:
>>
>> Noticed that the following links are incorrect (do not exist) and  
>> need to be fixed:
>> 	 four occurrences of #sec-tables needs to be replaced with   
>> #ex_DEPT
>> 	 one occurrence of sec-depttable_mapping needs to be replaced  
>> with #example-r2rml-view
>> 	 two occurrences of #def-template-value needs to be replaced with  
>> #dfn-template-value
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>>
>> Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> Another fix needed: (I somehow missed it)
>>> We need to remove the following bullet item from Section 6:
>>> 	 It MAY have one implicit predicate-object map.
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Souri.
>>>
>>> Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Boris, Noticed a minor issue in Figure 3: The * for the  
>>>> rr:predicateObjectMap label seems to be appearing below the  
>>>> label, instead of after-and-above the label. -- Souri.
>>>>
>>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please substitute the column name
>>>>>> deptId
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> DEPTID
>>>>>> It has four occurrences.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixed now (in v1.7).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>     Michael
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:52, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Noticed another problem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please substitute the column name
>>>>>> deptId
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> DEPTID
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has four occurrences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> - Souri.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History  
>>>>>>>> (Informative)", http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history 
>>>>>>>> , is absent.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Good catch, thanks, fixed!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:41, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Michael,
>>>>>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History  
>>>>>>>> (Informative)", http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history 
>>>>>>>> , is absent.
>>>>>>>> -- Souri. 
>>>>>>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Updates:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + R2RML http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/ 
>>>>>>>>>  is now pubrules compliant; I've fixed the open issues re  
>>>>>>>>> references and acks. If you do spot any typos or anomalies  
>>>>>>>>> please let me know ASAP - now is the time :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + DM http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110915/ 
>>>>>>>>>  is awaiting input (Eric, where are we with this? Please  
>>>>>>>>> note that the references to R2RML from DM should use http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope to get this out by today so that we can send the  
>>>>>>>>> publication request.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all the hard work so far!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 14 Sep 2011, at 11:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Eric, Souri,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Looking at the logs it looks like you've implemented the  
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday's resolutions. The next step is the publication  
>>>>>>>>>> of the LC Working Drafts. To this end, I've prepared two  
>>>>>>>>>> folders that will serve as the basis for the publication:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110914/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD- 
>>>>>>>>>> r2rml-20110914/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Eric, can you please copy your stuff in [1] so that in is  
>>>>>>>>>> self-containing and make it pub rules compliant [3] (note  
>>>>>>>>>> that in sec.3 there is still the note 'Todo (SQL  
>>>>>>>>>> datatypes): Follow ISSUE-48 referencing style used in  
>>>>>>>>>> R2RML.' - pls double check if this has been done and remove).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Souri, if you confirm that you have done everything from  
>>>>>>>>>> your side, I can take over from now (that is, clean up,  
>>>>>>>>>> copy it to [2] and make it pub rules compliant).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As the URIs [1] and [2] indicate I'd like to complete this  
>>>>>>>>>> by EoB, today, so please let me know where we are ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The next steps will be taken care of by the chairs and Ivan  
>>>>>>>>>> (transition announcement, etc.).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 18:37, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The minutes of today's meeting are available for review at  
>>>>>>>>>>> [1]. First, let me thank all involved people for their  
>>>>>>>>>>> patience and willingness to focus. I'm happy to say that  
>>>>>>>>>>> with today's telecon we are in Last Call:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: The WG has closed all pending issues and  
>>>>>>>>>>> decides to go LC with both R2RML and DM once the Editors  
>>>>>>>>>>> have implemented the resolutions of 2011-09-13 telecon
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see, this is a conditional resolution. We need  
>>>>>>>>>>> to hear back from the R2RML and DM Editors via the mailing  
>>>>>>>>>>> list (a simple reply to this message will do) concerning  
>>>>>>>>>>> the execution of the following resolutions:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-67 with going for option [1] and  
>>>>>>>>>>> make a note in the document referring to : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Sep/0009.html
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Remove section http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map 
>>>>>>>>>>>  that contains syntactic sugar for single predicate-object  
>>>>>>>>>>> map and postpone ISSUE-59
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Drop section 9 and close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-66  
>>>>>>>>>>> with it (maybe reuse text in a non-REC track document)
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In addition, the following issues have been resolved as  
>>>>>>>>>>> well:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-65 based on last weeks discussion  
>>>>>>>>>>> with general agreement
>>>>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to all for your hard work -  next steps are  
>>>>>>>>>>> for Ivan and me to get the administrative stuff sorted ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 16:51:51 UTC