Re: LC publication

Michael,

Another fix needed: (I somehow missed it)
We need to remove the following bullet item from Section 6:

    * It /MAY/ have one implicit predicate-object map
      <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map>.

Thanks,
- Souri.

Souripriya Das wrote:
> Boris, Noticed a minor issue in Figure 3: The * for the 
> rr:predicateObjectMap label seems to be appearing below the label, 
> instead of after-and-above the label. -- Souri.
>
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Please substitute the column name
>>> deptId
>>> with
>>> DEPTID
>>> It has four occurrences.
>>
>>
>> Fixed now (in v1.7).
>>
>> Cheers,
>>     Michael
>> -- 
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:52, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> Noticed another problem:
>>>
>>> Please substitute the column name
>>> deptId
>>>
>>> with
>>> DEPTID
>>>
>>> It has four occurrences.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Souri.
>>>
>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History 
>>>>> (Informative)", 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history, 
>>>>> is absent.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good catch, thanks, fixed!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>     Michael
>>>> -- 
>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>
>>>> On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:41, Souripriya Das wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Michael,
>>>>> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History 
>>>>> (Informative)", 
>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history, 
>>>>> is absent.
>>>>> -- Souri.
>>>>> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Updates:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + R2RML 
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/ is now 
>>>>>> pubrules compliant; I've fixed the open issues re references and 
>>>>>> acks. If you do spot any typos or anomalies please let me know 
>>>>>> ASAP - now is the time :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + DM 
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110915/ 
>>>>>> is awaiting input (Eric, where are we with this? Please note that 
>>>>>> the references to R2RML from DM should use 
>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to get this out by today so that we can send the 
>>>>>> publication request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for all the hard work so far!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Sep 2011, at 11:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric, Souri,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looking at the logs it looks like you've implemented the 
>>>>>>> yesterday's resolutions. The next step is the publication of the 
>>>>>>> LC Working Drafts. To this end, I've prepared two folders that 
>>>>>>> will serve as the basis for the publication:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] 
>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110914/ 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110914/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Eric, can you please copy your stuff in [1] so that in is 
>>>>>>> self-containing and make it pub rules compliant [3] (note that 
>>>>>>> in sec.3 there is still the note 'Todo (SQL datatypes): Follow 
>>>>>>> ISSUE-48 referencing style used in R2RML.' - pls double check if 
>>>>>>> this has been done and remove).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Souri, if you confirm that you have done everything from your 
>>>>>>> side, I can take over from now (that is, clean up, copy it to 
>>>>>>> [2] and make it pub rules compliant).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As the URIs [1] and [2] indicate I'd like to complete this by 
>>>>>>> EoB, today, so please let me know where we are ASAP.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next steps will be taken care of by the chairs and Ivan 
>>>>>>> (transition announcement, etc.).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 18:37, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The minutes of today's meeting are available for review at [1]. 
>>>>>>>> First, let me thank all involved people for their patience and 
>>>>>>>> willingness to focus. I'm happy to say that with today's 
>>>>>>>> telecon we are in Last Call:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: The WG has closed all pending issues and decides to 
>>>>>>>> go LC with both R2RML and DM once the Editors have implemented 
>>>>>>>> the resolutions of 2011-09-13 telecon
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As you can see, this is a conditional resolution. We need to 
>>>>>>>> hear back from the R2RML and DM Editors via the mailing list (a 
>>>>>>>> simple reply to this message will do) concerning the execution 
>>>>>>>> of the following resolutions:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-67 with going for option [1] and make a 
>>>>>>>> note in the document referring to : 
>>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Sep/0009.html 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Remove section 
>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map 
>>>>>>>> that contains syntactic sugar for single predicate-object map 
>>>>>>>> and postpone ISSUE-59
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Drop section 9 and close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-66 with 
>>>>>>>> it (maybe reuse text in a non-REC track document)
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In addition, the following issues have been resolved as well:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in 
>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [[
>>>>>>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-65 based on last weeks discussion with 
>>>>>>>> general agreement
>>>>>>>> ]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Again, thanks to all for your hard work -  next steps are for 
>>>>>>>> Ivan and me to get the administrative stuff sorted ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>>>>>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>>>>>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>>>>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>>>>>> Ireland, Europe
>>>>>>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>>>>>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>>>>>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>