- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:48:55 +0100
- To: Souripriya Das <SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History (Informative)", http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history > , is absent. Good catch, thanks, fixed! Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 15 Sep 2011, at 15:41, Souripriya Das wrote: > Michael, > Noticed that target for the TOC item "E. CVS History (Informative)", http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/#cvs-history > , is absent. > -- Souri. > > Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >> >> Updates: >> >> >> + R2RML http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110915/ >> is now pubrules compliant; I've fixed the open issues re references >> and acks. If you do spot any typos or anomalies please let me know >> ASAP - now is the time :) >> >> >> + DM http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110915/ >> is awaiting input (Eric, where are we with this? Please note that >> the references to R2RML from DM should use http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-r2rml-20110920/) >> >> I hope to get this out by today so that we can send the publication >> request. >> >> Thanks for all the hard work so far! >> >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 14 Sep 2011, at 11:15, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >>> >>> Eric, Souri, >>> >>> >>> Looking at the logs it looks like you've implemented the >>> yesterday's resolutions. The next step is the publication of the >>> LC Working Drafts. To this end, I've prepared two folders that >>> will serve as the basis for the publication: >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110914/ >>> >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/WD-r2rml-20110914/ >>> >>> >>> Eric, can you please copy your stuff in [1] so that in is self- >>> containing and make it pub rules compliant [3] (note that in sec.3 >>> there is still the note 'Todo (SQL datatypes): Follow ISSUE-48 >>> referencing style used in R2RML.' - pls double check if this has >>> been done and remove). >>> >>> Souri, if you confirm that you have done everything from your >>> side, I can take over from now (that is, clean up, copy it to [2] >>> and make it pub rules compliant). >>> >>> >>> As the URIs [1] and [2] indicate I'd like to complete this by EoB, >>> today, so please let me know where we are ASAP. >>> >>> >>> The next steps will be taken care of by the chairs and Ivan >>> (transition announcement, etc.). >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Michael >>> >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules >>> -- >>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >>> Ireland, Europe >>> Tel. +353 91 495730 >>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >>> http://sw-app.org/about.html >>> >>> On 13 Sep 2011, at 18:37, Michael Hausenblas wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> The minutes of today's meeting are available for review at [1]. >>>> First, let me thank all involved people for their patience and >>>> willingness to focus. I'm happy to say that with today's telecon >>>> we are in Last Call: >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: The WG has closed all pending issues and decides to >>>> go LC with both R2RML and DM once the Editors have implemented >>>> the resolutions of 2011-09-13 telecon >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> As you can see, this is a conditional resolution. We need to hear >>>> back from the R2RML and DM Editors via the mailing list (a simple >>>> reply to this message will do) concerning the execution of the >>>> following resolutions: >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-67 with going for option [1] and make a >>>> note in the document referring to : http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Sep/0009.html >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: Remove section http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#dfn-implicit-predicate-object-map >>>> that contains syntactic sugar for single predicate-object map >>>> and postpone ISSUE-59 >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: Drop section 9 and close ISSUE-61 and ISSUE-66 with >>>> it (maybe reuse text in a non-REC track document) >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> >>>> In addition, the following issues have been resolved as well: >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-48 as it is addressed in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#datatype-conversions >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-65 based on last weeks discussion with >>>> general agreement >>>> ]] >>>> >>>> Again, thanks to all for your hard work - next steps are for >>>> Ivan and me to get the administrative stuff sorted ;) >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Michael >>>> >>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/09/13-RDB2RDF-minutes.html >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >>>> Ireland, Europe >>>> Tel. +353 91 495730 >>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 14:49:29 UTC