- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:01:39 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Eric, I maintain my -1 to any design that asks a conforming DM implementation that operates over a conforming SQL-2008 implementation to discard information. Best, Richard On 11 Oct 2011, at 03:04, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> [2011-10-04 10:14-0700] >> Minutes of Oct 4 RDB2RDF Telcon are at http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-RDB2RDF-minutes.html > > per the action implied by > [[ > Ashok: "if your datatypes are inside of SQL *AND* XSD, this is the behavior. if not, it's undefined and we won't write test cases [outside of the intersection of the intersection of XSD *AND* SQL]" > ]] > I created a post LC version of the document: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/LC/Overview > and added some text about the derivation and extension of the data mappings in the Direct Graph: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/LC/Overview#minimal-DG > > >> Thanks to David for scribing >> -- >> All the best, Ashok >> > > -- > -ericP >
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 13:02:19 UTC