public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2011 by date

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

• Revelytix R2RML preview David McNeil
• Minutes of 2011-03-29 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC Nuno Lopes
• Test cases - current status and next steps Boris Villazón Terrazas

Friday, 25 March 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-29 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 24 March 2011

• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Michael Hausenblas
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Ivan Herman
• Re: [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• [closed] Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Michael Hausenblas

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

• Publication request - R2RML & Direct Mapping Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Fwd: R2RML ready for publication Souripriya Das
• Re: R2RML ready for publication Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML ready for publication Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

• Issues mentioned in R2RML draft Richard Cyganiak
• R2RML ready for publication Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-39 (refactor-common-props): Refactor R2RML spec to avoid duplicate definitions [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-38 (execution-environment): What is provided by the R2RML execution environment? [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-37 (connection-in-mapping): Allow specifying DB connection details in the R2RML mapping RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-36 (schema-triples): �??Terminology-level�?? triples as part of R2RML mapping output [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Minutes for March 22 Telcon Michael Hausenblas
• R2RML 2nd draft => ACTION-112: DONE Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Minutes for March 22 Telcon ashok malhotra
• ISSUE-35 (case sensitivity): Case sensitivity of SQL identifiers [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-34: R2RML terminology: addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] Richard Cyganiak

Monday, 21 March 2011

• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] David McNeil
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft Richard Cyganiak

Sunday, 20 March 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Souripriya Das

Saturday, 19 March 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Souripriya Das
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-22 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 17 March 2011

• Re: Minutes of 2011-03-15 telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: R2RML terminology: table or view name plus its owner name Hausenblas, Michael
• R2RML terminology: table or view name plus its owner name Sören Auer
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Boris Villazón Terrazas

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Souripriya Das
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 March 2011

• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data Alexander De Leon
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Alexander De Leon
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Robert Scanlon
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Robert Scanlon
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Souripriya Das
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Robert Scanlon
• Re: “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft Robert Scanlon
• “Default” vs “unnamed” graph Richard Cyganiak
• Attempted to address blank node issue in R2RML draft Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Robert Scanlon
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) Juan Sequeda
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) ashok malhotra
• Re: SemTech London (ACTION-101) Michael Hausenblas
• SemTech London (ACTION-101) Ivan Herman
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Minutes of 2011-03-15 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda
• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML: generating subject's class from input data Souripriya Das
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Robert Scanlon
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Richard Cyganiak
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Ivan Herman
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects David McNeil
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Sören Auer
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Alexander De Leon
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Ivan Herman
• R2RML: generating subject's class from input data Alexander De Leon
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 14 March 2011

• Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Test cases to check - including TC for ISSUE-28 Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Sören Auer
• Re: ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] Alexander De Leon
• Re: R2RML Linked Data Aspects Ivan Herman
• R2RML Linked Data Aspects Sören Auer
• R2RML: publishing the second draft Souripriya Das

Friday, 11 March 2011

• Re: Test issue: @base syntax Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Test issue: @base syntax David McNeil

Thursday, 10 March 2011

• ISSUE-33 (rr:template type in ObjectMapClass): How can rr:template be used in an ObjectMapClass to produce IRI's or Strings [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-32 (curly braces in joinCondition): Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition [R2RML] David McNeil
• ISSUE-32 (curly braces in joinCondition): Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Default Graph Contents Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

• Re: Default Graph Contents Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Default Graph Contents David McNeil
• Re: Default Graph Contents Souripriya Das
• Default Graph Contents David McNeil
• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used Alexandre Bertails

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used Enrico Franconi
• Minutes of 2011-03-08 telecon Hausenblas, Michael
• changes between R2RML v1.38 and v1.40 drafts Souripriya Das
• Re: temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used Ivan Herman
• temporal nature of T-box (and A-box), and why bNodes should rarely (if ever!) be used Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Heads-up re telecon meeting time 15 and 22 Mar 2011 Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Test case identification Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Test case identification Boris Villazón Terrazas

Monday, 7 March 2011

• ISSUE-31 (blank node identifier spec reference): Clarify reference to "blank node label" [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-30 (different blank node identifier): Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-29 (resource identifiers as strings): Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Test case identification Robert Scanlon
• ISSUE-28 (equivalent blank nodes): Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 6 March 2011

• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-08 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Friday, 4 March 2011

• Re: Test site broken? David McNeil
• Re: Test site broken? Ivan Herman
• Test site broken? David McNeil

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

• ISSUE-27 (unnamed graph?): NULL graphColumn value producing triples in an unnamed graph [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-26 (Named graphs and default graph): Producing triples in named graphs and the default graph [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Alexandre Bertails
• Minutes of 2011-03-01 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Nuno Lopes
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Juan Sequeda
• ISSUE-25 (Direct mapping in custom mappings): Including direct mapping constructs in R2RML mappings RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-24 (Complex joinConditions): Clarify support for complex joinConditions [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Alexandre Bertails
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Juan Sequeda
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-01 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 March 2011 17:53:58 UTC