public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from June 2011 by date

Thursday, 30 June 2011

Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner Juan Sequeda
Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner Boris Villazon-Terrazas
Re: Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner David McNeil
Propose to close ISSUE-34 by dropping rr:tableOwner Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution Richard Cyganiak
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution David McNeil
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution Richard Cyganiak
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution David McNeil
Closing ISSUE-2 (was: Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution) Richard Cyganiak

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution Richard Cyganiak
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution David McNeil
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution Richard Cyganiak
Re: Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution David McNeil
Formal objection to ISSUE-2 resolution Richard Cyganiak
Minutes from June 28 Telcon ashok malhotra
Re: Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) Richard Cyganiak
Re: Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) Michael Hausenblas
Agenda for June 28 Telcon (Today) ashok malhotra

Friday, 24 June 2011

Read: The Robustness Principle Reconsidered Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 23 June 2011

Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] Richard Cyganiak
Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 22 June 2011

Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Appeal to "database theory" in Direct Mapping Daniel Miranker
Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Michael Hausenblas
Appeal to "database theory" in Direct Mapping Richard Cyganiak
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Housekeeping on open/raised issues, with PROPOSAL David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Richard Cyganiak
Re: The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported Enrico Franconi
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Richard Cyganiak
Re: Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? David McNeil
Do we have consensus that we don't need more R2RML syntaxes? Richard Cyganiak
Re: Propose to postpone ISSUE-36 David McNeil
Propose to postpone ISSUE-36 Richard Cyganiak
Housekeeping on open/raised issues, with PROPOSAL Richard Cyganiak
Re: ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] Souripriya Das
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Minutes of 2011-06-21 telecon Michael Hausenblas
ISSUE-47 (invalid-iris): What happens when rr:column, rr:template etc produce invalid IRIs? [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
ISSUE-46 (shorter property names): Remove the "use" prefix from property names [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Nuno Lopes
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Seema Sundara
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Richard Cyganiak
RDB2RDF Test Case for ISSUE 42 Boris Villazón Terrazas
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Richard Cyganiak
Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Michael Hausenblas
ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Richard Cyganiak
Re: The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported Michael Hausenblas
Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Sören Auer
The mapping language MUST define the set of relational algebra to be supported Enrico Franconi
RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-06-21 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 20 June 2011

Re: R2RML, v 1.65 2011/06/15: implementation experience. Richard Cyganiak
ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 18 June 2011

Friday, 17 June 2011

Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping Enrico Franconi
Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping Enrico Franconi
Re: a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping Ivan Herman

Thursday, 16 June 2011

Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Ivan Herman
Re: Fwd: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Ivan Herman
Re: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Michael Hausenblas
Fwd: RDF WG Resolution Regarding Various Forms of String Literals Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Re: R2RML, v 1.65 2011/06/15: implementation experience. Michael Hausenblas
Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes Souripriya Das
a rigorous review of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/RDBNullValues#Direct_Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes Boris Villazón Terrazas
Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes Souripriya Das
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes Souripriya Das
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Minutes of 2011-06-14 telecon Michael Hausenblas
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Juan Sequeda
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Juan Sequeda
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping Ivan Herman
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Juan Sequeda
Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping Alexandre Bertails
Re: abstract syntax for R2RML mapping Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
abstract syntax for R2RML mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Juan Sequeda
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Michael Hausenblas
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Marcelo Arenas
Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi

Monday, 13 June 2011

Re: Fear for explicit NULL values Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Fear for explicit NULL values Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 Enrico Franconi
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon - Revision 1 ashok malhotra
Re: Agenda for June 14 Telcon Juan Sequeda
Agenda for June 14 Telcon ashok malhotra

Thursday, 9 June 2011

Re: Functions to compute URIs Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Functions to compute URIs Richard Cyganiak
Re: Functions to compute URIs Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Functions to compute URIs Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 8 June 2011

Re: Functions to compute URIs ashok malhotra
Re: Functions to compute URIs David McNeil
Re: Functions to compute URIs Alexandre Bertails
Re: Functions to compute URIs David McNeil
Re: Functions to compute URIs ashok malhotra
Functions to compute URIs David McNeil

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

Today's meeting cancelled ... Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 6 June 2011

Re: Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Issue 42 ashok malhotra
Re: Issue 42 Enrico Franconi

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Re: Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Issue 42 ashok malhotra

Saturday, 4 June 2011

Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Juan Sequeda

Friday, 3 June 2011

Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Juan Sequeda
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Juan Sequeda
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Richard Cyganiak
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Richard Cyganiak
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi

Thursday, 2 June 2011

Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Richard Cyganiak
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 1 June 2011

Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Proposed Resolution for Issue 42 Enrico Franconi
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL David McNeil
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Ivan Herman
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL David McNeil
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL ashok malhotra
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Richard Cyganiak
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL David McNeil
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL Ivan Herman
Re: Re-opening ISSUE-22 on vendor-specific SQL David McNeil

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2011 19:57:44 UTC