public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from July 2011 by date

Saturday, 30 July 2011

• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-08-02 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• ISSUE-62: Re-using public entity identifiers - external service call [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-61: Re-using public entity identifiers - look-up table [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 29 July 2011

• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Juan Sequeda
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Richard Cyganiak
• Why don't we have referencing subject/predicate/graph maps? Richard Cyganiak
• ISSUE-60 (simpler-logical-tables): Syntactic sugar for the simple case of logical tables [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-59 (simple-triples-maps): Syntactic sugar for triples maps that only have a single predicate-object map [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• R2RML spec - figures Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Juan Sequeda
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Juan Sequeda
• Re: Many-to-Many table in R2RML Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Many-to-Many table in R2RML Juan Sequeda
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda

Wednesday, 27 July 2011

• Re: ACTION-141 - Create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping Richard Cyganiak
• ACTION-141 - Create a SQL/XSD data dataype mapping Nuno Lopes

Tuesday, 26 July 2011

• Re: link errors in R2RML spec ashok malhotra
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping ashok malhotra
• Re: link errors in R2RML spec Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Proposal for the Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Proposal for the Direct Mapping Richard Cyganiak
• Correction to Minutes from July 26 Telcon ashok malhotra
• Minutes of 2011-07-26 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-26 meeting 1600 UTC ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-26 meeting 1600 UTC Nuno Lopes
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-26 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• link errors in R2RML spec Nuno Lopes
• Re: RDB2RDF Test Cases document Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 25 July 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF Test Cases document Richard Cyganiak
• RDB2RDF Test Cases document Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: Review of R2RML working draft Richard Cyganiak
• Non-Turtle mapping documents (ISSUE-57) (was: Re: Review of R2RML working draft) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-57 (r2rml-document-syntax): R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax [R2RML] Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-57 (r2rml-document-syntax): R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax [R2RML] David McNeil
• ISSUE-58 (turtle-introduction): R2RML doesn't introduce Turtle well enough [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-57 (r2rml-document-syntax): R2RML doesn't allow R2RML documents in RDF/XML syntax [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Review of R2RML working draft Sören Auer
• Re: Review of R2RML working draft Richard Cyganiak
• Review of R2RML working draft Sören Auer

Friday, 22 July 2011

• Re: More edits on the R2RML spec, incl. ISSUE-47 ashok malhotra
• More edits on the R2RML spec, incl. ISSUE-47 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Richard Cyganiak
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Michael Hausenblas
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Richard Cyganiak

Thursday, 21 July 2011

• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: rdb2rdf test cases Richard Cyganiak
• rdb2rdf test cases Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL David McNeil
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL Kingsley Idehen

Wednesday, 20 July 2011

• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL ashok malhotra
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL Kingsley Idehen
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL David McNeil
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL Nuno Lopes
• Re: R2RML implementation in XSPARQL David McNeil
• R2RML implementation in XSPARQL Nuno Lopes
• Re: Closing a few more issues David McNeil
• Re: Closing a few more issues Michael Hausenblas
• Closing a few more issues Richard Cyganiak

Tuesday, 19 July 2011

• Minutes of 2011-07-19 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC Seema Sundara
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-07-19 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Regrets for 19-JUL-2011 meeting Sören Auer

Monday, 18 July 2011

• ISSUE-56 (template-termtype): Default termType for template-valued term maps should be IRI [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-55 (nested-maps): Nested predicate-object maps [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-54 (constant-term-map): Simpler constant-valued term maps [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]] Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-53 (r2rml-in-rdfs): RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document [R2RML] Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-52 (extended-example): Extended example in the test cases document [Test Cases] Boris Villazon-Terrazas

Sunday, 17 July 2011

• regrets for 19-JUL-2011 meeting Souripriya Das

Friday, 15 July 2011

• Re: [Test Cases] DBs naming convention David McNeil

Thursday, 14 July 2011

• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Nuno Lopes

Wednesday, 13 July 2011

• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Implemented ISSUE-35 resolution on quoting and case sensitivity of identifiers David McNeil
• Implemented ISSUE-35 resolution on quoting and case sensitivity of identifiers Richard Cyganiak
• Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]] Juan Sequeda
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Juan Sequeda
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Michael Hausenblas

Tuesday, 12 July 2011

• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings ashok malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• [Test Cases] DBs naming convention Boris Villazon-Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Kingsley Idehen
• Re-opening issues 47 and 29 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-34, tableName David McNeil
• ISSUE-34, tableName Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings David McNeil
• Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]] David McNeil
• Minutes of 2011-07-12 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• ISSUE-37, ACTION-138: DBMS connection details in R2RML mappings Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]] Richard Cyganiak
• update ACTION-136 [Fwd: ACTION-136] Souripriya Das
• updated ACTION-137 [Re: ISSUE-45 (termtype-iris): IRIs instead of literals for rr:termType choices [R2RML]] Souripriya Das
• Re: Agenda for July 12 Telcon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Agenda for July 12 Telcon Juan Sequeda
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Souripriya Das
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Agenda for July 12 Telcon Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Fwd: Discontinuing UK and FR dial-in numbers for Zakim Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 11 July 2011

• Re: Agenda for July 12 Telcon Marcelo Arenas
• Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? ashok malhotra
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? David McNeil
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak

Sunday, 10 July 2011

• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Alexandre Bertails

Saturday, 9 July 2011

• Agenda for July 12 Telcon ashok malhotra
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak

Friday, 8 July 2011

• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• ISSUE-53 (r2rml-in-rdfs): RDFS vocabulary reference for R2RML, and namespace document [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-52 (extended-example): Extended example in the test cases document [Test Cases] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-51 (ill-typed-literals): Handling of ill-typed literals [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-50 (validation): Validation criteria for mapping graphs [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Richard Cyganiak
• Target audience of the Direct Mapping document? Richard Cyganiak

Thursday, 7 July 2011

• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Kingsley Idehen
• Improvements to Direct Mapping definition Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) David McNeil
• Re: Revisiting ISSUE-29 (implicit or explicit conversion to strings) David McNeil
• Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Kingsley Idehen
• RefPredicateMaps (was: Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 6 July 2011

• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Overhaul of R2RML spec Juan Sequeda
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• ISSUE-49 (sql-terminology): SQL terminology in R2RML [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-48 (sql-datatypes): Mapping SQL datatypes to RDF RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Request for comments: suggesting some minor R2RML changes Richard Cyganiak

Tuesday, 5 July 2011

• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: ACTION-133, ISSUE-22 Richard Cyganiak
• Revisiting ISSUE-29 (implicit or explicit conversion to strings) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: late regrets for 5 July 2011 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• late regrets for 5 July 2011 telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Fun with inverse expressions Richard Cyganiak

Monday, 4 July 2011

• Addressing ISSUE-47 (invalid and relative IRIs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Overhaul of R2RML spec Michael Hausenblas
• Overhaul of R2RML spec Richard Cyganiak

Last message date: Saturday, 30 July 2011 15:55:30 UTC