Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping]

On 15/02/2011 15:25, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> This should be on product R2RML and not direct mapping, right?
>
Yes, you are right.
It's already changed to R2RML.
Thanks David

> Juan Sequeda
> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> www.juansequeda.com <http://www.juansequeda.com>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:43 AM, RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker 
> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org <mailto:sysbot%2Btracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>
>     ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct
>     Mapping]
>
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/23
>
>     Raised by: David McNeil
>     On product: Direct Mapping
>
>     Currently tableOwner is required if the tableName property is
>     used. Change this so that tableOwner is optional.
>
>
>
>