public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from February 2011 by date

Monday, 28 February 2011

• Re: Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

• Re: Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash Juan Sequeda
• Re: Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash ashok malhotra
• Re: Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash Ivan Herman
• Re: Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash Juan Sequeda
• Issue 10 -- Hash vs. Slash ashok malhotra

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

• Re: Minutes for Feb 22 2011 Juan Sequeda
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-22 meeting 1700 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Minutes for Feb 22 2011 ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-22 meeting 1700 UTC Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-22 meeting 1700 UTC Seema Sundara

Monday, 21 February 2011

• TestCases - Status Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: IRIs for Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: IRIs for Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRIs for Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: IRIs for Direct Mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRIs for Direct Mapping Boris Villazón Terrazas

Friday, 18 February 2011

• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: SQL terminology Ivan Herman
• IRIs for Direct Mapping Juan Sequeda
• Re: IRI or URI test Ivan Herman

Thursday, 17 February 2011

• IRI or URI test Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• SQL terminology Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Ivan Herman
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Re: Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon Juan Sequeda
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon ashok malhotra
• Re: Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Alexandre Bertails
• Understanding some issues on the denotational semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon Alexandre Bertails
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-22 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: IRI or URI Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: IRI or URI Ivan Herman
• Re: IRI or URI Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• IRI or URI Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

• Minutes from Feb 15 Telcon ashok malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] Souripriya Das
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-15 meeting 1700 UTC Sören Auer
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-15 meeting 1700 UTC Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] Juan Sequeda
• Re: Mandatory tableOwner property David McNeil
• ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Monday, 14 February 2011

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-15 meeting 1700 UTC Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: Test cases to check Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: URI fragments in test cases Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: Mandatory tableOwner property Boris Villazón Terrazas

Saturday, 12 February 2011

• Re: Test cases to check Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 11 February 2011

• Re: Mandatory tableOwner property Robert Scanlon
• Re: Mandatory tableOwner property David McNeil

Thursday, 10 February 2011

• Re: Mandatory tableOwner property Souripriya Das
• Re: URI fragments in test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-15 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Mandatory tableOwner property David McNeil
• URI fragments in test cases David McNeil
• Test cases to check Boris Villazón Terrazas

Wednesday, 9 February 2011

• Re: TriplesMap type in test cases Boris Villazón Terrazas
• TriplesMap type in test cases David McNeil

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

• Re: Telcons on Feb 15 and Feb 22 Ivan Herman
• Re: Telcons on Feb 15 and Feb 22 ashok malhotra
• Re: Telcons on Feb 15 and Feb 22 Michael Hausenblas
• Telcons on Feb 15 and Feb 22 ashok malhotra
• Re: Minutes of 2011-02-08 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Minutes of 2011-02-08 telecon Juan Sequeda
• Re: Minutes of 2011-02-08 telecon ashok malhotra
• Re: Minutes of 2011-02-08 telecon ashok malhotra
• Minutes of 2011-02-08 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-08 meeting 1700 UTC Seema Sundara
• Regrets Richard Cyganiak
• New databases for the Direct Mapping Test Cases Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Test cases - new set of test cases accepted Boris Villazón Terrazas

Monday, 7 February 2011

• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation David McNeil
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-08 meeting 1700 UTC Nuno Lopes
• Re: Test cases to check Boris Villazón Terrazas

Friday, 4 February 2011

• Re: Fwd: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-08 meeting 1700 UTC Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 5 February 2011

• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation David McNeil
• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation Ivan Herman

Friday, 4 February 2011

• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Partial R2RML Implementation David McNeil
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-08 meeting 1700 UTC ashok malhotra
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-08 meeting 1700 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 3 February 2011

• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Pat Hayes
• Re: Test cases to check Ivan Herman
• Re: Test cases to check Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

• Fwd: Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] ashok malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] David McNeil
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] David McNeil
• Minutes of 2011-02-01 telecon Michael Hausenblas
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Ivan Herman
• Fwd: ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Fwd: 2011 Semantic Technology Conference: Speaker Status Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Souripriya Das
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes ashok malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Sören Auer
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Sören Auer
• Re: SQL in R2RML mappings David McNeil
• ISSUE-22 (vendor specific SQL): Support for database vendor specific SQL statements. [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-21 (inner/outer joins): Allow logical tables to be joined via either an inner or an outer join [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-20 (predicate/object refer to joined table): Allow a predicate/object map to reference a joined table. [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-19 (Reuse SQL query as sub-query): Reuse a SQL query as a sub-query [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-18 (SQL query reuse): Allow SQL queries to be reused in a mapping [R2RML] RDB2RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Test cases to check Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-01 meeting 1700 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Test cases to check Juan Sequeda
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-02-01 meeting 1700 UTC Percy Enrique Rivera Salas
• Re: Test cases to check Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Re: Test cases to check Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-9 Another question about Generate Blank Nodes Juan Sequeda
• Test cases to check Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Test cases - new set of test cases accepted Boris Villazón Terrazas
• Test cases - ACTION-91 Boris Villazón Terrazas

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2011 13:19:54 UTC