- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:42:32 +0100
- To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
On 14 Sep 2010, at 12:34, Harry Halpin wrote: > However, if we wish to continue the time-honored Semantic Web > tradition of > having catchy names, we could call the language SQRL (squirrel), > i.e. SQL > to RDF Language. I like it. The only serious issue that I see with this name is the food chain relationship between owls and squirrels! Richard > A quick google search shows that this particular acronym > is not completly colonized by some other standard or product. The main > drawback of this name is that it may be too cute to be taken > seriously. > > Anyways, food for thought. I'm happy with either name, or *any* name > for > that matter. > > cheers, > harry > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 11:43:07 UTC