Re: [R2RML Test cases] Reorganizing the test cases

> Did you guys come up with a machine-readable solution? I need something
> stable enough to adapt our test suites.

See [1] with an RDFa extractor, such as [2]

Cheers,
      Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/
[2] 
http://any23.org/any23/rdfxml/http:/www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:05:55 -0500
> To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> Cc: <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: [R2RML Test cases] Reorganizing the test cases
> Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:07:33 +0000
> 
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 18:55 +0000, Harry Halpin wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> After a quick look at the minutes, I think you suggested sth like
>>> 
>>> - the expected default mapping result as separate entry
>>> - reorganization of the test cases, sth like
>>>      direct graph mapping
>>>      features of the r2rml
>>> - put the db-direct pairs in the first half of the document?
>>> - In TC3, due to absence of primary key, the subject will be a bNode?
>>> -  it might be better to have one kind of test cases for direct, and
>>> another kind for r2rml?
>>> 
>> 
>> I think Eric proposed that we have the test-cases organized by database,
>> and then after each database a single direct graph test-cases and then
>> multiple R2RML test-cases.
>> 
>> -db1
>> -direct graph1
>> -r2rml 1a
>> -r2rml 1b
>> 
>> -db2
>> -direct graph2
>> -r2rml 2a
>> -r2rml 2b
>> -r2rml 2c
>> 
>> I thought it might be easier to do it linearly (i.e. direct graph then
>> R2RML), but I'm OK with Eric's sugggestion. I suspect Richard is as well.
> 
> Did you guys come up with a machine-readable solution? I need something
> stable enough to adapt our test suites.
> 
> Alexandre.
> 
>> 
>>> Since I was out of the call, would you pls clarify the aforementioned
>>> points?
>>> 
>>> Thank you in advance and regards
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Boris
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 19:14:19 UTC