Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-11-16 meeting 1700 UTC

Regrets for today's call.

Thanks
Seema.

Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> All,
>
> Below the agenda for our next week's meeting. We will try to get the 'Direct
> Mapping' out as FPWD and start reviewing some R2RML Test Cases. Time
> permitting, we will have a look at some other requirements regarding R2RML,
> based on our charter.
>
> Cheers,
>       Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2010-11-16
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Tuesday, 16 November *17:00-18:00 UTC* Local time:
> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=16&year=2010&h
> our=17&min=00&sec=0
> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) Conference code : 7322733# (spells
> "RDB2RDF")
> Duration : 60 minutes
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C IRC Web Client :
> http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
> Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
> Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Chair: Michael
> Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim
>
> 1. Admin 
>
> + PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see
> http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>
> + FYI: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/status/2010/
>
> + How to handle comments on WD (monitor public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
>  and use http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/)
>
>
> 2. Preparation of FPWD 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF'
>    (Marcelo, Eric, Juan)
>
> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/
>
>
> 3. Review of R2RML Test Cases
>    (Boris)
>
> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases
>
>
> 4. R2RML - Mapping to Ontologies
>    (Ashok)
>
> >From our charter http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter:
>
> [[
> The mapping language specification SHOULD include guidance with regard to
> mapping relational data to a subset of OWL such as OWL QL or OWL RL."
> ]]
>
> 5. R2RML - Linked Data aspects
>    (Michael)
>
> >From our charter http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter:
>
> [[
> The mapping language MUST allow for a mechanism to create identifiers for
> database entities. The generation of identifiers should be designed to
> support the implementation of the linked data principles. Where possible,
> the language will encourage the reuse of public identifiers for long-lived
> entities such as persons, corporations and geo-locations.
> ]]
>
> See also write-up at
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects
>
>
> 6. AOB
>
>
> Cheers,
>       Michael
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 16:05:08 UTC