Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-11-16 meeting 1700 UTC

> Regrets -- travelling.
>

Regrets - also travelling. However, I do hope the WG can get to FPWD. If
there any major disagreements amongst the editors, let's just make it an
open issue and print anyways.

> Richard
>
>
> On 13 Nov 2010, at 14:24, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Below the agenda for our next week's meeting. We will try to get the
>> 'Direct
>> Mapping' out as FPWD and start reviewing some R2RML Test Cases. Time
>> permitting, we will have a look at some other requirements regarding
>> R2RML,
>> based on our charter.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>      Michael
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> AGENDA Teleconference
>> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2010-11-16
>> ----------------------------------------------------------
>> Tuesday, 16 November *17:00-18:00 UTC* Local time:
>> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=16&year=2010&h
>> our=17&min=00&sec=0
>> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) Conference code : 7322733# (spells
>> "RDB2RDF")
>> Duration : 60 minutes
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C IRC Web Client :
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
>> Zakim information : http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>> Zakim bridge monitor : http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
>> Zakim IRC bot : http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Chair: Michael
>> Scribe: Zakim, pick a victim
>>
>> 1. Admin
>>
>> + PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/11/09-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
>>
>> + FYI: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/status/2010/
>>
>> + How to handle comments on WD (monitor public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
>> and use http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/)
>>
>>
>> 2. Preparation of FPWD 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF'
>>   (Marcelo, Eric, Juan)
>>
>> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directMapping/
>>
>>
>> 3. Review of R2RML Test Cases
>>   (Boris)
>>
>> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/R2RML_Test_Cases
>>
>>
>> 4. R2RML - Mapping to Ontologies
>>   (Ashok)
>>
>>> From our charter http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter:
>>
>> [[
>> The mapping language specification SHOULD include guidance with
>> regard to
>> mapping relational data to a subset of OWL such as OWL QL or OWL RL."
>> ]]
>>
>> 5. R2RML - Linked Data aspects
>>   (Michael)
>>
>>> From our charter http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter:
>>
>> [[
>> The mapping language MUST allow for a mechanism to create
>> identifiers for
>> database entities. The generation of identifiers should be designed to
>> support the implementation of the linked data principles. Where
>> possible,
>> the language will encourage the reuse of public identifiers for long-
>> lived
>> entities such as persons, corporations and geo-locations.
>> ]]
>>
>> See also write-up at
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/LinkedDataAspects
>>
>>
>> 6. AOB
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>      Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 11:02:30 UTC