- From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:57:28 -0400
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
I'm confused. Are there technical decisions we agreed on? > Section 4: Datalog Semantic Notation, from wiki I assume. I don't remember any decision/consensus about: * what the semantics is * that it should be written using datalog * that it should be part of the Direct Mapping document > Section 5: Relational Algebra Semantic Notation (from Soeren's note - > Soeren, is this possible?) I thought we agreed that Relational Algebra was not enough to capture RDB... So I don't understand, really. Alexandre.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 14:57:31 UTC