Re: Default Mapping and tomorrow's telcon

On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> * Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> [2010-11-03 12:08-0500]
> > Marcelo and I are working on
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/alt
> >
> > <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/alt>we are working on top
> of
> > the structure and content that Eric started in
> >
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph<
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/alt>
> >
> > we have gotten already comments on what we have done. So, in order to
> > present one document, I suggest that Eric goes through our proposal and
> > comment on [1] with the hopes of making [1] the final document that we
> will
> > present.
> >
> > Does that work with you Eric?
>
> Sure, I can give a detailed review in about 4 hours, after a meeting
> with Mike Stonbraker; I'll incorporate his feedback.
>
>
Awesome!!!


>
> > Juan Sequeda
> > +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> > www.juansequeda.com
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/2/2010 5:43 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> > > >> I think we're making progress on that. Juan, Marcelo and I are
> working
> > > >> out our editorial predilections on a pair of documents with
> identical
> > > >> structure. On the 9th, the WG can look at the two and cherry pick
> the
> > > >> pieces they like.
> > > >
> > > > /I am concerned with the *pair of documents" bit.  Could you guys
> create
> > > a
> > > > single document?
> > > > I am not keen to make the WG pick between documents.
> > >
> > > Strong second. We need *ONE* document with the common agreed upon clear
> > > English text, and then the two (or three) semantic notations lined up.
> > >
> > >  To produce *two* documents makes review harder both by the WG and
> wider
> > > communities, and I don't see any reason to do so. If anything, one of
> the
> > > reasons why the direct mapping/semantics debate has taken so long is
> the
> > > vast number of wiki-pages and HTML pages produced :)
> > >
> > > So, by the Nov 9th meeting, can we agree to have *one* document with
> the
> > > semantic notations lined up that we can then send to first the WG and
> then
> > > the wider community to review?
> > >
> > > > Ashok
> > > > /
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> -ericP
>