Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review

Souri,

> I do feel strongly about this. So, please go ahead and put it on the agenda.

Sure! Your wish is my command.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Souripriya Das <SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
> 
> Michael,
> 
> I do feel strongly about this. So, please go ahead and put it on the agenda.
> 
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: michael.hausenblas@deri.org
> To: SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com
> Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:02:29 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
> 
> 
> Souri,
> 
>> One of my comments [1] for "then" Section 3 examples and "then" Section 4.1.8
>> (MANYTOMANY) was to replace the names of persons with more generic names. In
>> the new revised version, Section 3 has been removed and Section 4.1.8 has
>> become Section 3.1.10 (MANYTOMANY).
> 
> Indeed. Sorry that we didn't have time to go through this last meeting but
> can do tomorrow if you wish. The reason why I didn't implement it is rather
> simple: this is a quite common practice (using WG member's names in example)
> and unless the affected people don't cry out and have objections seeing
> their names there, I'd rather keep it like it is.
> 
> So, if I understand you correctly, formally, your proposal is:
> 
> PROPOSAL: Replace all WG names in examples with generic names, esp. in
> section 3.1.10
> 
> If you want to have this proposal discussed tomorrow, please ack this mail
> now and I put it on the agenda (will do this after review Ahmed's comments).
> 
> Cheers,
>       Michael
> 
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
> 
> 
> 
>> From: Souripriya Das <SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com>
>> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 12:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
>> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
>> Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
>> 
>> One of my comments [1] for "then" Section 3 examples and "then" Section 4.1.8
>> (MANYTOMANY) was to replace the names of persons with more generic names. In
>> the new revised version, Section 3 has been removed and Section 4.1.8 has
>> become Section 3.1.10 (MANYTOMANY).
>> 
>> I'd suggest replacing the names with something from the following list, if it
>> is okay with other members:
>> 
>>    1. Sneezy
>>    2. Sleepy
>>    3. Dopey
>>    4. Doc
>>    5. Happy
>>    6. Bashful
>>    7. Grumpy
>> 
>> "Doc" may be left out if we need only 6 names.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Souri%27s_UCR_Review
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: michael.hausenblas@deri.org
>> To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:29:34 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> Thanks everyone for the productive meeting yesterday - we're almost there
>> with the UC document.
>> 
>> I have now worked in all of yesterday's resolutions (and my respective
>> actions) resulting in $Id: Overview.xml,v 1.55 2010/05/26 10:20:44 mhausenb
>> Exp $ [1]. Note that ANY further comments should be against this version
>> (1.55) and must be clear and unambiguous (REMOVE this, ADD this, whatever).
>> 
>> The changes I made (compared to v1.48 of [1] we discussed yesterday) are:
>> 
>> ===
>> 
>> 1.49: minor fixes (UC1 and 4.1.2 title) as spotted by Juan
>> 
>> 1.50:
>> addressed: "RESOLUTION: Keep glossary, move to end." [1]
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03
>> 
>> 1.51:
>> addressed: "Update UC2 reqs re ETL." [1] and also added new requirement
>> (4.1.5 ETL - Extract-Transform-Load) as well as some re-ordering of the reqs
>> to have a better flow
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/57
>> 
>> 1.52:
>> addressed: "RESOLUTION: Use reqs from Section 4 to update UC4" with my
>> ACTION-58 [1]
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/58
>> 
>> 1.53:
>> addressed: "RESOLUTION: To put a link to the full excerpt in the OBO
>> example, not an excerpt" [1] --- need Juan's pointer to the ontology to
>> complete this
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03
>> 
>> 1.54:
>> addressed: "RESOLUTION: Section 3 should be moved to Appendix" [1]
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-rdb2rdf-minutes.html#item03
>> 
>> 1.55:
>> removed requirement "Database connection" as requested by Ashok and Ahmed
>> (checked back with Soeren and is ok for him)
>> 
>> ===
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>       Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>> Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
>>> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:04:38 +0100
>>> To: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
>>> Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:05:16 +0000
>>> 
>>> 
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> The latest version of the "Use Cases and Requirements for Mapping Relational
>>> Databases to RDF" document with $Id: Overview.xml,v 1.47 2010/05/25 12:24:01
>>> mhausenb Exp $ is now available [1].
>>>             
>>> I've incorporated all editorial/grammatical/typo-level issues. The remaining
>>> issues to be discussed today are listed at [2].
>>> 
>>> Harry, can you please provide the logs to be filled into the Wiki page [3]?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>>       Michael
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
>>> [2] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements/Reviews#Op
>>> en_Issues
>>> [3] 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements/Reviews#Ch
>>> ange_Logs
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> Ireland, Europe
>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 12:52:00 UTC