RE: Images of RDB2RDF options updated

Juan,

It sounds like the three options images are the same image?

I missed the last meeting and what was discussed.  In your list, Option-1 is a special case of Option-2; I questions its value but we can leave it as a special case of Option-2 in your current list.

I suggest:


1.       Local Ontology mapping + local-to-domain Ontology mapping

*         Local Ontology mapping only (option)

2.       DB Schema to Domain ontology direct mapping

If you look at many current products they typically use option-1 above.

Ahmed

Ahmed K. Ezzat, Ph.D.
HP Fellow, Strategic Innovation Architecture Manager,
Business Intelligence Software Division
Hewlett-Packard Corporation
11000 Wolf Road, Bldg 42 Upper, MS 4502, Cupertino, CA 95014-0691
Office:      Email: Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com<mailto:Ahmed.Ezzat@hp.com> Off: 408-447-6380  Fax: 1408796-5427
Personal:   Email: AhmedEzzat@aol.com<mailto:AhmedEzzat@aol.com> Tel: 408-253-5062  Fax:  408-253-6271


From: public-rdb2rdf-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rdb2rdf-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Juan Sequeda
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:18 PM
To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Subject: Images of RDB2RDF options updated

Hi Everybody

Ted and I have updated the images that depict the three different RDB2RDF options.

[1] Option 1: Direct Mapping (no domain ontology involved
[2] Option 2: Direct Mapping + Ontology to Ontology Mapping
[3] Option 3: Database to Ontology Mapping (no visible local ontology

Please note that the current Option 3 was the old Option 2 (and vice-versa)

Let me know if there are questions

Cheers

[1] http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_Option_1.jpg
[2] http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_Option_2.jpg<http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_Option_1.jpg>
[3] http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_Option_3.jpg<http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~jsequeda/rdb2rdf/RDB2RDF_Option_1.jpg>

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com<http://www.juansequeda.com>