Re: Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?

> I'll lend my explicit support for eventual publication of UC&R as a Note.

+1, as per charter, yes.

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html



> From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
> Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:25:40 -0400
> To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
> Cc: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?
> Resent-From: RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 14:26:21 +0000
> 
> On 5/12/2010 10:23 AM, Harry Halpin wrote:
>> Everyone,
>> 
>>     In preparation to publish the Working Group Note, we're aiming to have
>> it published either next Tuesday or Thursday, depending on when I get
>> approval for publication from the editors.
>> 
>> The main point is that we have to tell the W3C whether this document will
>> go through the entire Recommendation process of patent exclusions and
>> other steps, or after X months (where I'm guessing X is about 3, tell me
>> if otherwise), we publish the use-case document as a Working Group Note.
>> In our original schedule, we have agreed to publish the use-case document
>> as a Note as per Section 2.2 of the charter [1], so I'm sending this
>> e-mail out to make sure this is fine with the WG. If I don't hear any
>> explicit comments, I'm going to assume that publication as a Working Draft
>> for comments, and then finalization as a W3C Working Group Note is the
>> proper path for the use-case document.
> 
> I'll lend my explicit support for eventual publication of UC&R as a Note.
> 
> Lee
> 
>> 
>>                 cheers,
>>                      harry
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter.html
>> 
>> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 14:33:23 UTC