Re: New members of the group

Thanks Juan

I see, Math and Physics as data and they are classes in the Domain 
Ontology. The step after the direct mapping, i.e. ontology to ontology 
mapping.
But you do not consider to map directly to the Local Ontology as classes 
(as far as I can see).

Again, sorry if this is out of scope.

Regards

Boris


On 11/05/2010 16:23, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> Boris,
>
> This is a good point. This is what is shown in Section 3.3.
>
> You can see that in the RDB we have Math and Physics as data, but they 
> are classes in the Domain Ontology.
>
> Juan Sequeda
> +1-575-SEQ-UEDA
> www.juansequeda.com <http://www.juansequeda.com>
>
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Boris Villazón Terrazas 
> <bvillazon@fi.upm.es <mailto:bvillazon@fi.upm.es>> wrote:
>
>     Dear all
>
>     Thanks!
>     We will try to join the telecon.
>     Of course we have to read the set of documents generated so far.
>
>     Regarding the Use Cases and Requirements draft, I just checked it
>     (a quick look), and I, in my humble opinion, have a minor comment
>      (maybe you already discussed this):
>     - Section 3 Approaches:
>     As far as I can understand you are considering to map the database
>     schema to an ontology, and the database content to ontology
>     instances, right?
>     But, maybe there will be the case of mapping the content of the
>     database into an ontology.
>     For example a database may store a classification of occupations
>     [1] that we want to convert to an ontology [2].
>     is this case out of the scope of the R2RML?
>
>     Sorry, if I'm introducing noise in the discussion of the draft.
>
>
>     Regards
>
>     Boris
>
>
>     [1] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/img/occupationsdatabase.png
>     [2] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/img/OccupationsOntology.png
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     On 10/05/2010 18:35, Harry Halpin wrote:
>
>         Boris and Alexander,
>
>            Welcome to the group! Eric Prud'hommeaux and myself are the
>         W3C Team
>         Contacts for the Working Group, and can help you with any
>         questions
>         about the W3C standardization process.
>
>          Our next telecon is tomorrow, with details given on the WG's
>         homepage
>         [1]. Also, you may want to review (ideally by sending an
>         e-mail to the
>         list before the telecon) the current Use Cases and
>         Requirements draft
>         [2].
>
>         [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/
>         [2]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
>
>
>             Dear all
>
>             Since last Friday,  we (Alexander de Leon and Boris
>             Villazón-Terrazas)
>             are new members of this working group.
>             We are students working at the Ontology Engineering Group
>             from the
>             Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
>
>             We will try to do our best to contribute to this working
>             group.
>
>             Thanks and best regards
>
>             Boris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>