Monday, 31 May 2010
- replacing current names in Sec 3.1.10 with generic names [Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review]
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-06-01 meeting 1700 UTC
- Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
- Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
- Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
- Re: documenting a default mapping
- Re: documenting a default mapping
- Re: Who will be at SemTech and willing to participate in panel?
- documenting a default mapping
Sunday, 30 May 2010
Thursday, 27 May 2010
- Re: Who will be at SemTech and willing to participate in panel?
- Re: Who will be at SemTech and willing to participate in panel?
- Re: Who will be at SemTech and willing to participate in panel?
- Who will be at SemTech and willing to participate in panel?
- Re: RDB2RDF WG...
- RE: RDB2RDF WG...
- Re: RDB2RDF WG...
- Re: RDB2RDF WG...
- RDB2RDF WG...
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
- Re: RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 25, 2010
- Re: Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
- Re: RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 25, 2010
- Second Round of RDB2RDF UC doc review
- RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Monday, 24 May 2010
- Re: Are we having an RDB2RDF panel at SemTech 2010 conference?
- Re: Are we having an RDB2RDF panel at SemTech 2010 conference?
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- Are we having an RDB2RDF panel at SemTech 2010 conference?
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
Saturday, 22 May 2010
Friday, 21 May 2010
Sunday, 23 May 2010
- Re: UC&R review comments [Re: Comments by this evening]
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
Saturday, 22 May 2010
- UC&R review comments [Re: Comments by this evening]
- +1 Was: Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- Alexander comments on UC document
- More comments on use case and req doc
Friday, 21 May 2010
Saturday, 22 May 2010
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- RE: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
- Comments by this evening
Thursday, 20 May 2010
- Re: Comments on UC document - reminder
- Re: Comments on UC document - reminder
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- RE: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Comments on UC document - reminder
- F2F meeting at SemTech2010
- Re: Comments on Requirements and Usecase Document
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Tuesday, 18 May 2010
- Re: Agenda for RDB2RDF Telecon 2010-05-18
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for telecon 18 May 2010 1700 UTC
- Re: Agenda for RDB2RDF Telecon 2010-05-18
- Agenda for RDB2RDF Telecon 2010-05-18
Monday, 17 May 2010
- Re: Update on publication of use-case document
- Re: Note re authors/editors
- Update on publication of use-case document
- Note re authors/editors
Saturday, 15 May 2010
Friday, 14 May 2010
- Re: Images of RDB2RDF options updated
- RE: Images of RDB2RDF options updated
- Re: Images of RDB2RDF options updated
- RE: Images of RDB2RDF options updated
- Images of RDB2RDF options updated
Thursday, 13 May 2010
- Re: Final grammatical comments on use-case document
- Re: Final grammatical comments on use-case document
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
- Final grammatical comments on use-case document
- Re: Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?
- Re: Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?
- Re: Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?
- Status of Use-Cases should be W3C Working Group Note, correct?
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
- Use Cases and Requirements ready for FPWD
- Minutes for today's call
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- 回复:RDB2RDF WG agenda for telecon 11 May 2010 1700 UTC
- 回复:feedback on the current Use case & Requirements for RDB2RDF...
- Re: New members of the group
- Re: New members of the group
- Re: New members of the group
- RDB2RDF WG agenda for telecon 11 May 2010 1700 UTC
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: New members of the group
- Re: New members of the group
- Re: feedback on the current Use case & Requirements for RDB2RDF...
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Re: New members of the group
Sunday, 9 May 2010
Monday, 10 May 2010
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Sample SQL [Was: Re: Review of UC Document]
- Review of UC Document
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
Sunday, 9 May 2010
- Re: review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Re: feedback on the current Use case & Requirements for RDB2RDF...
- feedback on the current Use case & Requirements for RDB2RDF...
Saturday, 8 May 2010
Tuesday, 4 May 2010
- review request for http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- Minutes from today's meeting
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon
- Re: RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 4, 2010
- Re: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon
- RDB2RDF: a picture is worth a thousand words
- Re: RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 4, 2010
- Re: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon
- RE: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon
- Re: RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 4, 2010
- RDB2RDF WG Agenda - Tuesday, May 4, 2010
- Re: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon
- Re: Role of the Ontology and Expressivity - to discuss on telcon