public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org from July 2010 by date

Friday, 30 July 2010

• Agenda for August 3 Telcon ashok malhotra

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Boris Villazón-Terrazas
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Minutes from July 27 Telcon ashok malhotra
• Re: Agenda for July 27 Telcon Marcelo Arenas
• Re: RIF in terms of SQL views and Datalog: Juan Sequeda
• RIF in terms of SQL views and Datalog: Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Alex Miller
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Alex Miller
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Juan Sequeda

Monday, 26 July 2010

• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Juan Sequeda
• Re: D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Alex Miller
• D2RQ and Revelytix semantics Juan Sequeda

Saturday, 24 July 2010

• Re: On semantics-based approaches and still using full vendor-specific SQL Marcelo Arenas

Friday, 23 July 2010

• Re: On semantics-based approaches and still using full vendor-specific SQL Daniel Miranker
• Re: On semantics-based approaches and still using full vendor-specific SQL Juan Sequeda
• On semantics-based approaches and still using full vendor-specific SQL Harry Halpin
• Re: Agenda for July 27 Telcon Alex Miller
• Agenda for July 27 Telcon ashok malhotra

Thursday, 22 July 2010

• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? ashok malhotra
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Harry Halpin
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: The minimum we need to deliver Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Juan Sequeda
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Harry Halpin
• Re: Proposal for three tier RDB2RDF standard - and relationship with SQL core Marcelo Arenas

Wednesday, 21 July 2010

• Proposal for three tier RDB2RDF standard - and relationship with SQL core Daniel Miranker
• Re: The minimum we need to deliver Marcelo Arenas
• Re: The minimum we need to deliver Juan Sequeda
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Richard Cyganiak
• The minimum we need to deliver Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Harry Halpin
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? ashok malhotra
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? ashok malhotra
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? Harry Halpin
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? ashok malhotra
• Re: Defining a SQL fragment? (was: Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics) Harry Halpin
• Defining a SQL Fragment ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF semantics Richard Cyganiak
• Defining a SQL fragment? (was: Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics) Richard Cyganiak
• Set semantics for the stem graph (was: Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach?) Richard Cyganiak

Tuesday, 20 July 2010

• Minutes of 2010-07-20 call Seema Sundara
• RDB2RDF semantics Sören Auer
• Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Marcelo Arenas

Monday, 19 July 2010

• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Marcelo Arenas
• Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Harry Halpin
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-20 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Marcelo Arenas
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Alex Miller
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Marcelo Arenas
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix ashok malhotra
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Michael Hausenblas

Sunday, 18 July 2010

• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Alex Miller
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Juan Sequeda
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Harry Halpin
• Re: Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Juan Sequeda
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? ashok malhotra
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Juan Sequeda
• Re: RDB2RDF by Revelytix Michael Hausenblas
• RDB2RDF by Revelytix Juan Sequeda
• Using Datalog as a common semantics for SQL/RIF-based approaches? Harry Halpin
• Re: Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Daniel Miranker
• Relationship between EricP's default mapping and Datalog rules approach? Harry Halpin

Saturday, 17 July 2010

• Re: Eric's RIF simple mapping Eric Prud'hommeaux

Friday, 16 July 2010

• Eric's RIF simple mapping Juan Sequeda

Tuesday, 13 July 2010

• Telecons in July and August 2010 ... Michael Hausenblas
• Minutes of 2010-07-13 call Richard Cyganiak
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-13 meeting 1600 UTC Marcelo Arenas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-13 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-13 meeting 1600 UTC Juan Sequeda

Monday, 12 July 2010

• Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-13 meeting 1600 UTC Nuno Lopes
• RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2010-07-13 meeting 1600 UTC Michael Hausenblas

Thursday, 8 July 2010

• FW: changed FR and UK dial-in numbers for teleconferences Michael Hausenblas

Monday, 5 July 2010

• NO TELECON tomorrow Michael Hausenblas

Last message date: Friday, 30 July 2010 11:57:48 UTC