- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:01:12 +0100 (BST)
- To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Also, we need a test-case document, although according to the charter we still have until Nov. to get a FPWD out. It may be a good idea, particularly when sharpening the spec and dealing with any design cases, to start developing the concrete test-cases now. There's a good paper from Norm Gray on this [1], and I imagine HCLS will have quite a few test-cases we can re-use. This also will require 3 interoperable implementations. So who is planning on implementing this? -Oracle? -OpenLink? -Cambridge Semantics? Metamotix seems to not be participating anymore. Howard, you out there? Any opensource systems? D2RQ/MySQL and Federate (EricP's work) would be ideal, and I imagine that there are other open-source and research-based systems (Ultrawrap, Li Ma's work, etc.)? cheers, harry [1] http://www.eswc2009.org/program-menu/accepted-papers/113-alasdair-j-g-gray-norman-gray-and-iadh-ounis-can-rdb2rdf-tools-feasibly-expose-large-science-archives-for-data-integration?format=pdf
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 14:01:14 UTC