- From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 10:10:04 -0400
- To: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <t2mf914914c1004270710n9ff4330ev67f869a79653adc9@mail.gmail.com>
Ted, Good point. I think if we generalize scenario 4 as you propose then Lee's use case can fit. Juan Sequeda +1-575-SEQ-UEDA www.juansequeda.com On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ted Thibodeau Jr < tthibodeau@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > *** Juan Sequeda wrote: > >>> Lee, I propose that you write a use-case that your company has > >>> and this may lead into a scenario 5. > > ** Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > >> Can you explain what you mean? I thought that's what I _had_ done. > >> I'm not at liberty to write-up actual customers' database schemas, > >> which is why I simplified these use cases to the relevant (to us) > >> points. > > * Juan Sequeda wrote: > > You state: > > > > My organization's uses of this technology all fall broadly under > > the category of needing to expose RDB data to tools that consume > > data via arbitrary SPARQL queries. > > > > This can be a scenario on its own, or where would this fit in the > > other 4 scenarios that I propose? > > > Lee's organization's use above seems to me to clearly fall into > Juan's Scenario #4, -- > > > Scenario 4. I'm not interested in integrating my RDB with other > > sources (structured, rdf, unstructured). However, I do want to > > expose my RDB as RDF because I want semantic web search engines > > that crawl RDF data to index me and I want to become a Linked Data > > hub and let other people link to me. > > -- which could be reworded to be somewhat more general, e.g., -- > > ...because I want my RDB data to be available for SPARQL or > other RDF-based querying, and/or for others to integrate > with other data sources (structured, rdf, unstructured). > > This doesn't require crawling by search engines, nor becoming a hub > (which can have scary connotations for small organizations), though > such exposure and accessibility *might* be chosen. > > Also, Lee's restriction against exposing actual schemas and data is > part of why Use Cases should be generalized, and not be written as > Case Studies. > > > Be seeing you, > > Ted > > > > -- > A: Yes. http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html > | Q: Are you sure? > | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? > > Ted Thibodeau, Jr. // voice +1-781-273-0900 x32 > Evangelism & Support // mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com > // http://twitter.com/TallTed > OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/ > 10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803 > http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/ > OpenLink Blogs http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/ > http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ > Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:10:44 UTC