Re: Comments on Use Case for discussion on telcon

Ted,

Good point. I think if we generalize scenario 4 as you propose then Lee's
use case can fit.

Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com


On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Ted Thibodeau Jr <
tthibodeau@openlinksw.com> wrote:

>
> *** Juan Sequeda wrote:
> >>> Lee, I propose that you write a use-case that your company has
> >>> and this may lead into a scenario 5.
>
> ** Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> >> Can you explain what you mean? I thought that's what I _had_ done.
> >> I'm not at liberty to write-up actual customers' database schemas,
> >> which is why I simplified these use cases to the relevant (to us)
> >> points.
>
> * Juan Sequeda wrote:
> > You state:
> >
> >    My organization's uses of this technology all fall broadly under
> >    the category of needing to expose RDB data to tools that consume
> >    data via arbitrary SPARQL queries.
> >
> > This can be a scenario on its own, or where would this fit in the
> > other 4 scenarios that I propose?
>
>
> Lee's organization's use above seems to me to clearly fall into
> Juan's Scenario #4, --
>
> > Scenario 4. I'm not interested in integrating my RDB with other
> > sources (structured, rdf, unstructured). However, I do want to
> > expose my RDB as RDF because I want semantic web search engines
> > that crawl RDF data to index me and I want to become a Linked Data
> > hub and let other people link to me.
>
> -- which could be reworded to be somewhat more general, e.g., --
>
>   ...because I want my RDB data to be available for SPARQL or
>   other RDF-based querying, and/or for others to integrate
>   with other data sources (structured, rdf, unstructured).
>
> This doesn't require crawling by search engines, nor becoming a hub
> (which can have scary connotations for small organizations), though
> such exposure and accessibility *might* be chosen.
>
> Also, Lee's restriction against exposing actual schemas and data is
> part of why Use Cases should be generalized, and not be written as
> Case Studies.
>
>
> Be seeing you,
>
> Ted
>
>
>
> --
> A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
> | Q: Are you sure?
> | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
> Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
>                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
>                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
> OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
>                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
>    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:10:44 UTC