Re: R2RML ontology bug? constant shortcut property definition not according to spec.

On 24. feb. 2016 14:19, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>> On 24 Feb 2016, at 12:32, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I can confirm that the domain definitions for rr:subject, rr:predicate, rr:object and rr:graph in https://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml.ttl <https://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml.ttl> do not match (or even resemble) the specification.
>>>
>>> There are numerous other problems with the OWL representation of this namespace document.
>>>
>>> I’m afraid the document is unfit for purpose and best ignored.
>>
>> Or, alternatively, the document is updated and changed…
>
> Yes, this would of course be preferable.
>
> But there are numerous issues with the current document, so this would be a slightly bigger project.

Not knowing what these issues are, would it not be possible to do a 
first quick fix by removing the causes of the inconsistencies and let 
the next version just be a mere vocabulary listing?

I would be interesting in joining (also) the slightly bigger project of 
making a richer version of the ontology.

Martin

> Is it still known how the document was produced? There are HTML+RDFa, Turtle and RDF/XML variants (and possibly others?). Which one is the master copy? What toolchain was used to produce the others?
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>>
>> The point is: while it is not possible to change a file on /TR, I do not see any problem changing the namespace document in case there is a documented bug.
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Richard
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 24 Feb 2016, at 11:08, Martin G. Skjæveland <martige@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I think I have identified problems with the constant shortcut properties rr:subject, rr:predicate, rr:object and rr:graph in the R2RML ontology (http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml). It seems at their domain definitions are wrong and not according to the specification text.
>>>>
>>>> The attached test ontology contains two examples which are equivalent according to the recommendation text, but inconsistent according to the R2RML ontology. The attachment explains this in more detail.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Martin G. Skjæveland
>>>> <r2rml-test.ttl>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Digital Publishing Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
>

Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2016 13:47:39 UTC