- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 20:35:52 +0100
- To: public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
Found this on #swig. DanC is Dan Connolly. http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2011-09-21#T18-49-00 18:49:00 <DanC> I gather the RDF/SQL stuff went to last call. Anybody looked at it? Do they have a test suite? 18:49:27 <DanC> http://www.w3.org/News/2011#entry-9208 18:50:08 <DanC> the word "test" does not occur in http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20110920/ . not a good sign 18:50:34 <DanC> ah. via the WG home page I find http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ 18:52:28 <DanC> "The purpose of the Test Cases is to verify and validate the specification of the R2RML language and Direct mapping. " 18:52:38 <DanC> what does it mean to verify a spec? or to validate it? 18:53:28 <DanC> "For each database we have: ... The SQL script associated to the database (sql file). " associated in what way? do they mean: a SQL script that produces the database? 18:55:20 <DanC> "R2RML engine A software that takes ..." hm. sounds like a translation from some other language. I guess I'll give some slack on editorial issues. 18:56:17 <DanC> bummer... spec references aren't hyperlinks 18:58:11 <DanC> bug in HTML version of direct mapping from D002-1table2columns1row. The ttl version looks ok. 18:58:33 <DanC> "10"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#integer> 18:58:37 <DanC> bother. please just write: 10
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 19:36:33 UTC