- From: Dominique Guardiola <dguardiola@quinode.fr>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:59:50 +0100
- To: public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org
I'm glad my comments could have been useful Thanks for adding the example for the translation table in SQL, this is clearer now for me > You also said: > >> ISSUE-66 : > The working group discussed this at length. Ultimately, the argument that carried the day was that translation tables can be written in pure SQL without too much difficulty, and therefore it is considered acceptable to ship R2RML 1.0 without dedicated support for translation tables. -- Dominique Guardiola, QUINODE • http://www.quinode.fr/ • Tel : 04.27.86.84.37 • Mob : 06.15.13.22.27
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2011 09:00:50 UTC