Another editorial error in R2RML

In the A.2.2 example the set of triples contain

<xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type xyz:emp .

Shouldn't that be

<xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type <xyz.com/emp/job/CLERK> .

instead, per 3.1.1.9? Also, shouldn't there be an extra 

<xyz.com/emp/7369> rdf:type <xyz.com/emp/etype/PART_TIME> .

triple?

I must say I am not convinced that having rr:RDFTypeProperty is really useful. I can set the type by simply using rr:property rdf:type, so this is some sort of a shorthand for which I do not see the real necessity...

Ivan


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf