Right, Martynas, dokieli makes a lot of sense. This should then happen in a GitHub repository so that we can collaborate. We could use the GitHub repository that we already have.
Cheers, Christoph
--
Christoph Lange(-Bever)
Fraunhofer IAIS
http://langec.wordpress.com/about
Sent from a mobile device; please excuse my brevity.
---- Martynas Jusevièius wrote ----
Or we could try something like Dokieli which produces RDFa, in the spirit of dogfooding.
https://dokie.li
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Lange-Bever, Christoph <Christoph.Lange-Bever@iais.fraunhofer.de<mailto:Christoph.Lange-Bever@iais.fraunhofer.de>> wrote:
Hi all,
devilspawn1980@googlemail.com<mailto:devilspawn1980@googlemail.com> <devilspawn1980@googlemail.com<mailto:devilspawn1980@googlemail.com>> on behalf of Quentin Reul <Quentin.H.Reul@gmail.com<mailto:Quentin.H.Reul@gmail.com>> on 02 June 2017 22:12:
> I think that a position paper would be great to increase the visibility in our efforts. I would like to volunteer as an author and let me know how I could be of assistance.
please count me in too. I think that our existing material will serve well as a basis. Minus those things about XML and RDF that the ISWC audience knows anyway. And plus some references that substantiates our claims about what XSLT is good or bad at.
I would suggest using a collaborative LaTeX platform such as Overleaf to work on the text.
Cheers,
Christoph
--
Dr. Christoph Lange, Fraunhofer IAIS / Universität Bonn
At Fraunhofer IAIS: +49 2241 14-2428<tel:%2B49%202241%2014-2428> (redirects to mobile); room B3-212
At the University: +49 228 73-4603<tel:%2B49%20228%2073-4603>; Römerstraße 164, Room A209
Further contacts (Skype etc.): http://langec.wordpress.com/about