- From: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 06:26:58 +0200
- To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- Cc: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>, "Dirschl, Christian" <Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com>, "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>, "Lange-Bever, Christoph" <Christoph.Lange-Bever@iais.fraunhofer.de>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>, "public-rax@w3.org" <public-rax@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL58czoVSrg10_Po6PP2ZvAj9jLX5VBROAZZfFvYyB9hLoQ6aA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Jose, all, 2017-07-18 22:24 GMT+02:00 Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>: > I started to convert the contents in the Google doc to LaTeX. > > I used Overleaf as it can be collaboratively edited. > > The following link to current draft is here, and I think that if you have > that link you can edit it: > > https://www.overleaf.com/10362311mfbjhrvrgjmb > > There is also a git repository in case you prefer to edit it offline. > > https://git.overleaf.com/10362311mfbjhrvrgjmb > > > If you prefer to continue editing in the Google Doc, I would ask you to > mark the new content so I can change it easily in the Latex...of course, if > you can use LaTeX, it would be easier. > I will use Latex for further edits. I will do editing tonight. > > I have doubts with the list of authors and institutions...I added 4 > authors as a test...(please forgive me the other members of the group that > I didn't add...). I really don't know what is the best way to proceed about > authorship here. > Christian, what is your view as a co-chair of the group no this? > > About the contents...we should probably add some content because at this > moment it is quite general...the problem that I can see is that if we start > adding approaches or technologies, then the paper would automatically grow > in size...while if we try to keep it simple and just add a few, then it > would be unfair for the technologies that we don't mention... > Indeed. What do others think on this? Best, Felix > > I have a travel tomorrow and will probably not be able to work more on > this. On thursday morning I could probably work a little bit more. > > Best regards, Jose Labra > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I started to extend the google docs based on what this available. >> Christian, all, would that may be sufficient as a first draft? Please feel >> free to edit my text as you like, nothing is set in stone. >> >> Who would do the actual submission? >> >> Best, >> >> Felix >> >> >> 2017-07-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Dirschl, Christian < >> Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com>: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks Jose Labra for this preparation and for your availability to >>> transform the final version in the right format. >>> >>> >>> >>> I just made a first try on certain parts of the document. >>> >>> Please have a look asap and note your name behind the sections you want >>> to work on more detail. >>> >>> Is it possible to have a first draft in place by tomorrow EOB? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks and best >>> >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> >>> *Von:* Jose Emilio Labra Gayo [mailto:jelabra@gmail.com] >>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 14. Juli 2017 11:36 >>> *An:* Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> >>> *Cc:* Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com>; Dirschl, Christian < >>> Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com>; Lange-Bever, Christoph < >>> Christoph.Lange-Bever@iais.fraunhofer.de>; Axel Polleres < >>> axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>; public-rax@w3.org >>> *Betreff:* Re: AW: RAX Position Paper >>> >>> >>> >>> I created a possible google doc with the proposed contents: >>> >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KAUawomGOeADfvL2CjaL2g3u >>> qvOKuA9z-D43xTRpKnc/edit?usp=sharing >>> >>> If you want fill it with the contents, I can convert that to a LaTeX >>> file following the conference format. >>> >>> Best regards, Jose Labra >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 about a google doc >>> >>> I will be at the conference in Amsterdam. >>> >>> Jean-Pierre >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo [jelabra@gmail.com] >>> Sent: 14 July 2017 10:57 >>> To: Felix Sasaki >>> Cc: Dirschl, Christian; Lange-Bever, Christoph; Axel Polleres; >>> public-rax@w3.org >>> Subject: Re: AW: RAX Position Paper >>> >>> >>> I didn't reply first because I have an academic role working for the >>> University of Oviedo. >>> >>> Anyway, I could also help if you want. Should we start preparing a >>> collaborative place where we could edit the document? Something like >>> Overleaf or ShareLaTeX, or just Google Doc? >>> >>> Best regards, Jose Labra >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com >>> <mailto:felix@sasakiatcf.com>> wrote: >>> Hello Christian and Christopher, >>> >>> I am happy to contribute as well. Someone has to provide a first draft >>> and others fill in. Who would like to make a start? The structure from >>> Christian >>> >>> Thesis (the one above) >>> Motivation (problem statements) >>> State of the Art >>> Approaches and outlook >>> >>> is fine by me. >>> >>> - Felix >>> >>> >>> 2017-07-13 10:27 GMT+02:00 Dirschl, Christian < >>> Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com<mailto:Christian.Dirsch >>> l@wolterskluwer.com>>: >>> Dear Christoph, >>> >>> I am available to contribute my share. >>> If we are a team of 3, I think we could make it. >>> How do we split the effort. Can we use the structure I developed? >>> >>> Please advise. >>> >>> Best >>> Christian >>> >>> Von: Lange-Bever, Christoph [mailto:Christoph.Lange-Bever@ >>> iais.fraunhofer.de<mailto:Christoph.Lange-Bever@iais.fraunhofer.de>] >>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2017 09:20 >>> An: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com<mailto:felix@sasakiatcf.com>>; >>> Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at<mailto:axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>>; >>> Dirschl, Christian <Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com<mailto: >>> Christian.Dirschl@wolterskluwer.com>> >>> Cc: public-rax@w3.org<mailto:public-rax@w3.org> >>> Betreff: RE: AW: RAX Position Paper >>> >>> Dear Christian, dear all, >>> >>> well, maybe there are resources to get the two-pager done by 20th. Felix >>> would be available, I would as well (from tomorrow afternoon), if you were >>> available you would even be able to represent one sector of industry. How >>> much substantial details from industry do we expect on 2 pages anyway? >>> Shouldn't we just draft something and ask our busy industry colleagues for >>> some last minute input? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Christoph >>> >>> -- >>> Christoph Lange(-Bever) >>> Fraunhofer IAIS >>> http://langec.wordpress.com/about >>> Sent from a mobile device; please excuse my brevity. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- Jose Labra >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ------------------ >>> >>> ************************************************** >>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are >>> addressed. >>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the system >>> manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept >>> by the mailgateway >>> ************************************************** >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- Jose Labra >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > -- Jose Labra > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2017 04:27:31 UTC